PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XBAP vs. DECZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XBAP vs. DECZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April (XBAP) and TrueShares Structured Outcome (December) ETF (DECZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XBAP vs. DECZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XBAP
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April
1.23%13.38%11.55%20.53%-7.59%7.48%
DECZ
TrueShares Structured Outcome (December) ETF
-3.57%12.34%18.89%18.32%-8.93%13.75%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XBAP achieves a 1.23% return, which is significantly higher than DECZ's -3.57% return.


XBAP

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.52%
YTD
1.23%
6M
3.38%
1Y
12.13%
3Y*
12.52%
5Y*
10Y*

DECZ

1D
2.04%
1M
-3.73%
YTD
-3.57%
6M
-1.59%
1Y
11.87%
3Y*
13.04%
5Y*
9.56%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XBAP vs. DECZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XBAP and DECZ have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Return for Risk

XBAP vs. DECZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XBAP
XBAP Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
XBAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XBAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
XBAP Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
XBAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
XBAP Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

DECZ
DECZ Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
DECZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DECZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
DECZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
DECZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
DECZ Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XBAP vs. DECZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April (XBAP) and TrueShares Structured Outcome (December) ETF (DECZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XBAPDECZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.21

0.85

+0.36

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.83

1.31

+0.51

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.19

+0.25

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.61

1.29

+0.32

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.81

5.68

+5.13

XBAP vs. DECZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XBAP Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is higher than the DECZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XBAP and DECZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XBAPDECZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.21

0.85

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.84

+0.06

Correlation

The correlation between XBAP and DECZ is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

XBAP vs. DECZ - Dividend Comparison

XBAP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DECZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%.


TTM20252024202320222021
XBAP
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DECZ
TrueShares Structured Outcome (December) ETF
3.40%3.28%2.55%1.23%1.44%0.46%

Drawdowns

XBAP vs. DECZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XBAP drawdown since its inception was -14.57%, smaller than the maximum DECZ drawdown of -16.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBAP and DECZ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XBAPDECZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.57%

-16.57%

+2.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.25%

-9.43%

+1.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-5.64%

+5.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.80%

-3.13%

+1.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.23%

2.14%

-0.91%

Volatility

XBAP vs. DECZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April (XBAP) is 0.52%, while TrueShares Structured Outcome (December) ETF (DECZ) has a volatility of 4.00%. This indicates that XBAP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DECZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XBAPDECZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.52%

4.00%

-3.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.75%

7.69%

-5.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.12%

13.99%

-3.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.99%

12.59%

-2.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.99%

12.48%

-2.49%