XBAL.TO vs. XUT.TO
XBAL.TO (iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio) and XUT.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Capped Utilities Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XBAL.TO is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by iShares, while XUT.TO is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Gbl GR CAD. XBAL.TO is actively managed, while XUT.TO is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XBAL.TO returned 7.66%/yr vs 8.96%/yr for XUT.TO. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XBAL.TO charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for XUT.TO.
Performance
XBAL.TO vs. XUT.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XBAL.TO achieves a 7.90% return, which is significantly lower than XUT.TO's 16.33% return. Over the past 10 years, XBAL.TO has underperformed XUT.TO with an annualized return of 7.66%, while XUT.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 8.96% annualized return.
XBAL.TO
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 2.87%
- YTD
- 7.90%
- 6M
- 6.86%
- 1Y
- 18.03%
- 3Y*
- 14.22%
- 5Y*
- 8.02%
- 10Y*
- 7.66%
XUT.TO
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 4.08%
- YTD
- 16.33%
- 6M
- 13.38%
- 1Y
- 21.77%
- 3Y*
- 12.14%
- 5Y*
- 6.77%
- 10Y*
- 8.96%
XBAL.TO vs. XUT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XBAL.TO iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio | 7.90% | 11.90% | 15.80% | 13.05% | -11.16% | 10.16% | 10.73% | 15.34% | -2.73% | 5.55% |
XUT.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped Utilities Index ETF | 16.33% | 14.74% | 13.09% | -0.45% | -11.02% | 8.92% | 14.74% | 36.63% | -8.30% | 10.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between XBAL.TO and XUT.TO is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2011 | 0.40 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XBAL.TO and XUT.TO has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.40, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XBAL.TO vs. XUT.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XBAL.TO
XUT.TO
XBAL.TO vs. XUT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio (XBAL.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Capped Utilities Index ETF (XUT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XBAL.TO | XUT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.49 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.84 | 2.83 | +0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.82 | 8.04 | +3.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XBAL.TO vs. XUT.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XBAL.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.55%, smaller than the maximum XUT.TO drawdown of -37.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBAL.TO and XUT.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XBAL.TO | XUT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.55% | -37.65% | +9.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.06% | -7.64% | +1.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.34% | -17.51% | +8.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.10% | -28.54% | +11.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.93% | -37.65% | +16.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.36% | 0.00% | -0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.35% | -5.81% | +2.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.46% | 2.69% | -1.23% |
Volatility
XBAL.TO vs. XUT.TO - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio (XBAL.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.49% compared to iShares S&P/TSX Capped Utilities Index ETF (XUT.TO) at 2.56%. This indicates that XBAL.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XUT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XBAL.TO | XUT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.49% | 2.56% | +0.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.46% | 7.57% | -0.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.76% | 8.76% | 0.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.84% | 12.77% | -3.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.78% | 16.17% | -6.39% |
XBAL.TO vs. XUT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XBAL.TO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than XUT.TO's 0.61% expense ratio.
Dividends
XBAL.TO vs. XUT.TO - Dividend Comparison
XBAL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%, less than XUT.TO's 3.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XBAL.TO iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio | 2.11% | 2.27% | 2.72% | 2.43% | 2.12% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 2.31% | 3.47% | 3.00% | 3.72% | 3.38% |
XUT.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped Utilities Index ETF | 3.25% | 3.91% | 4.00% | 3.90% | 3.80% | 3.04% | 4.51% | 3.57% | 4.52% | 3.57% | 3.74% | 4.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XBAL.TO and XUT.TO have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XBAL.TO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XBAL.TO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for XUT.TO.
XBAL.TO is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while XUT.TO is Utilities Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XBAL.TO and 0.61% for XUT.TO.
Find the right allocation for XBAL.TO and XUT.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer