XBAL.TO vs. FEQT.NEO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XBAL.TO (iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio) and FEQT.NEO (Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, XBAL.TO returned 17.48% vs 24.74% for FEQT.NEO. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XBAL.TO charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for FEQT.NEO.

Performance

XBAL.TO vs. FEQT.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio (XBAL.TO) and Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund (FEQT.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XBAL.TO achieves a 7.81% return, which is significantly lower than FEQT.NEO's 10.30% return.

XBAL.TO

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: 4.13%
• YTD: 7.81%
• 6M: 6.00%
• 1Y: 17.48%
• 3Y*: 14.21%
• 5Y*: 8.15%
• 10Y*: 7.69%

FEQT.NEO

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: 4.01%
• YTD: 10.30%
• 6M: 10.63%
• 1Y: 24.74%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XBAL.TO vs. FEQT.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
XBAL.TO iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio	7.81%	11.87%	9.76%
FEQT.NEO Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund	10.30%	19.42%	14.08%

Correlation

The correlation between XBAL.TO and FEQT.NEO is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2024	0.89

The correlation between XBAL.TO and FEQT.NEO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XBAL.TO vs. FEQT.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XBAL.TO

XBAL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 61
XBAL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
XBAL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
XBAL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 62
XBAL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
XBAL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 65

FEQT.NEO

FEQT.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 66
FEQT.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
FEQT.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
FEQT.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 69
FEQT.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
FEQT.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XBAL.TO vs. FEQT.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio (XBAL.TO) and Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund (FEQT.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XBAL.TO	FEQT.NEO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.06	2.26	-0.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.87	3.17	-0.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.42	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.89	2.99	-0.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.15	12.96	-0.80
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XBAL.TO vs. FEQT.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XBAL.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the FEQT.NEO Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XBAL.TO and FEQT.NEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XBAL.TO	FEQT.NEO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.06	2.26	-0.19
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.82	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.68	1.77	-1.09

Drawdowns

XBAL.TO vs. FEQT.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XBAL.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.83%, which is greater than FEQT.NEO's maximum drawdown of -13.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBAL.TO and FEQT.NEO.

Drawdown Indicators

	XBAL.TO	FEQT.NEO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.83%	-13.24%	-15.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.06%	-8.31%	+2.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.35%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.12%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-20.93%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.36%	-1.02%	+0.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.39%	-1.45%	-1.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.44%	1.91%	-0.47%

Volatility

XBAL.TO vs. FEQT.NEO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio (XBAL.TO) is 3.14%, while Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund (FEQT.NEO) has a volatility of 3.89%. This indicates that XBAL.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FEQT.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XBAL.TO	FEQT.NEO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.14%	3.89%	-0.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.21%	8.88%	-1.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.51%	11.01%	-2.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.79%	12.45%	-3.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.37%	12.45%	-3.08%

XBAL.TO vs. FEQT.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XBAL.TO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FEQT.NEO's 0.43% expense ratio.

Dividends

XBAL.TO vs. FEQT.NEO - Dividend Comparison

XBAL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%, more than FEQT.NEO's 0.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FEQT.NEO Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund	0.82%	0.91%	0.91%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XBAL.TO iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio	2.10%	2.24%	2.68%	2.40%	2.09%	1.74%	1.99%	2.26%	3.39%	2.93%	3.64%	3.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XBAL.TO and FEQT.NEO in my portfolio?

XBAL.TO and FEQT.NEO have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XBAL.TO or FEQT.NEO?

On fees, XBAL.TO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XBAL.TO or FEQT.NEO?

XBAL.TO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for FEQT.NEO.

What is the main difference between XBAL.TO and FEQT.NEO?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XBAL.TO and 0.43% for FEQT.NEO.