PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XBAG.DE vs. XG7S.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XBAG.DE vs. XG7S.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers II ESG Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF 1D (XBAG.DE) and Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 5C (XG7S.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XBAG.DE achieves a 0.49% return, which is significantly higher than XG7S.DE's 0.23% return. Over the past 10 years, XBAG.DE has outperformed XG7S.DE with an annualized return of -0.06%, while XG7S.DE has yielded a comparatively lower -0.93% annualized return.


XBAG.DE

1D
0.04%
1M
0.60%
YTD
0.49%
6M
-0.07%
1Y
-0.20%
3Y*
0.24%
5Y*
-1.25%
10Y*
-0.06%

XG7S.DE

1D
0.13%
1M
0.58%
YTD
0.23%
6M
-0.34%
1Y
-1.32%
3Y*
-0.74%
5Y*
-2.42%
10Y*
-0.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XBAG.DE vs. XG7S.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XBAG.DE
Xtrackers II ESG Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF 1D
0.49%-3.89%3.40%1.86%-11.56%2.92%-0.49%9.25%3.04%-6.07%
XG7S.DE
Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 5C
0.23%-4.70%2.17%1.03%-13.47%0.52%0.56%7.95%3.41%-5.58%

Correlation

The correlation between XBAG.DE and XG7S.DE is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2014

0.88

The correlation between XBAG.DE and XG7S.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XBAG.DE vs. XG7S.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XBAG.DE
XBAG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
XBAG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XBAG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
XBAG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
XBAG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
XBAG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

XG7S.DE
XG7S.DE Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
XG7S.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XG7S.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
XG7S.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
XG7S.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
XG7S.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XBAG.DE vs. XG7S.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II ESG Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF 1D (XBAG.DE) and Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 5C (XG7S.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XBAG.DEXG7S.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

0.95

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.08

-0.47

+0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.16

-0.91

+0.74

XBAG.DE vs. XG7S.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XBAG.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is higher than the XG7S.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XBAG.DE and XG7S.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XBAG.DEXG7S.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

-0.33

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.20

-0.38

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.01

-0.16

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.16

+0.11

Drawdowns

XBAG.DE vs. XG7S.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XBAG.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.64%, smaller than the maximum XG7S.DE drawdown of -21.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBAG.DE and XG7S.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XBAG.DEXG7S.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.64%

-21.08%

+4.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.44%

-2.81%

+0.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.49%

-7.74%

+0.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.81%

-18.20%

+2.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.64%

-21.08%

+4.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.21%

-19.11%

+6.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.65%

-8.76%

+2.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.23%

1.45%

-0.22%

Volatility

XBAG.DE vs. XG7S.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers II ESG Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF 1D (XBAG.DE) is 0.99%, while Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 5C (XG7S.DE) has a volatility of 1.23%. This indicates that XBAG.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XG7S.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XBAG.DEXG7S.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.99%

1.23%

-0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.67%

2.97%

-0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.78%

3.98%

-0.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.08%

6.39%

-0.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.92%

5.85%

+0.07%

XBAG.DE vs. XG7S.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XBAG.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than XG7S.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XBAG.DE vs. XG7S.DE - Dividend Comparison

XBAG.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%, while XG7S.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
XBAG.DE
Xtrackers II ESG Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF 1D
3.00%2.94%3.16%2.22%2.78%0.82%1.47%1.76%1.36%1.11%2.04%
XG7S.DE
Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 5C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XBAG.DE and XG7S.DE have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XBAG.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XBAG.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XG7S.DE.

Both ETFs track Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for XBAG.DE and 0.20% for XG7S.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XBAG.DE and XG7S.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer