PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XBAE.DE vs. EXUS.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XBAE.DE vs. EXUS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers II ESG Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF 5C EUR hedged (XBAE.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C USD (EXUS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XBAE.DE achieves a -0.55% return, which is significantly lower than EXUS.DE's 9.64% return.


XBAE.DE

1D
0.05%
1M
-0.24%
YTD
-0.55%
6M
-0.54%
1Y
1.07%
3Y*
1.72%
5Y*
-1.74%
10Y*
-0.46%

EXUS.DE

1D
0.19%
1M
1.53%
YTD
9.64%
6M
11.66%
1Y
20.06%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XBAE.DE vs. EXUS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XBAE.DE and EXUS.DE is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2024

0.20

The correlation between XBAE.DE and EXUS.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (all time) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XBAE.DE vs. EXUS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XBAE.DE
XBAE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
XBAE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XBAE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
XBAE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
XBAE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
XBAE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

EXUS.DE
EXUS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
EXUS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXUS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXUS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
EXUS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXUS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XBAE.DE vs. EXUS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II ESG Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF 5C EUR hedged (XBAE.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C USD (EXUS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XBAE.DEEXUS.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.31

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.30

2.30

-2.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.83

9.01

-8.17

XBAE.DE vs. EXUS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XBAE.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is lower than the EXUS.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XBAE.DE and EXUS.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XBAE.DEEXUS.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

1.62

-1.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

1.10

-1.02

Drawdowns

XBAE.DE vs. EXUS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XBAE.DE drawdown since its inception was -19.04%, which is greater than EXUS.DE's maximum drawdown of -16.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBAE.DE and EXUS.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XBAE.DEEXUS.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.04%

-16.21%

-2.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.11%

-8.68%

+5.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.88%

-0.76%

-10.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.91%

-1.78%

-4.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.11%

2.23%

-1.12%

Volatility

XBAE.DE vs. EXUS.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers II ESG Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF 5C EUR hedged (XBAE.DE) is 1.32%, while Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C USD (EXUS.DE) has a volatility of 3.28%. This indicates that XBAE.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EXUS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XBAE.DEEXUS.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.32%

3.28%

-1.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.86%

10.06%

-7.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.46%

12.37%

-8.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.00%

13.39%

-8.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.63%

13.39%

-8.76%

XBAE.DE vs. EXUS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XBAE.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than EXUS.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XBAE.DE vs. EXUS.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XBAE.DE nor EXUS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XBAE.DE and EXUS.DE have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XBAE.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XBAE.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for EXUS.DE.

XBAE.DE is categorized as Global Bonds, while EXUS.DE is Global Equities. XBAE.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI Global Aggregate Sustainable and SRI Currency Neutral (EUR Hedged), while EXUS.DE tracks MSCI World ex USA index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for XBAE.DE and 0.15% for EXUS.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XBAE.DE and EXUS.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer