PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XBAE.DE vs. EUNA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XBAE.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers II ESG Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF 5C EUR hedged (XBAE.DE) and iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XBAE.DE achieves a -0.55% return, which is significantly lower than EUNA.DE's -0.46% return.


XBAE.DE

1D
0.05%
1M
-0.24%
YTD
-0.55%
6M
-0.54%
1Y
1.07%
3Y*
1.72%
5Y*
-1.74%
10Y*
-0.46%

EUNA.DE

1D
0.22%
1M
-0.12%
YTD
-0.46%
6M
-0.07%
1Y
1.32%
3Y*
2.28%
5Y*
-1.29%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XBAE.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XBAE.DE
Xtrackers II ESG Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF 5C EUR hedged
-0.55%2.65%0.52%4.36%-14.60%-2.16%3.70%5.33%-1.57%-0.35%
EUNA.DE
iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc
-0.46%2.79%1.60%4.36%-13.52%-2.37%3.70%5.06%-1.17%-0.54%

Correlation

The correlation between XBAE.DE and EUNA.DE is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2017

0.74

The correlation between XBAE.DE and EUNA.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (all time) to 0.86 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XBAE.DE vs. EUNA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XBAE.DE
XBAE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
XBAE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XBAE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
XBAE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
XBAE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
XBAE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

EUNA.DE
EUNA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
EUNA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUNA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUNA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
EUNA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUNA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XBAE.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II ESG Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF 5C EUR hedged (XBAE.DE) and iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XBAE.DEEUNA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.06

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.30

0.43

-0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.83

1.18

-0.35

XBAE.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XBAE.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is comparable to the EUNA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XBAE.DE and EUNA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XBAE.DEEUNA.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

0.34

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.35

-0.28

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

-0.05

+0.13

Drawdowns

XBAE.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XBAE.DE drawdown since its inception was -19.04%, which is greater than EUNA.DE's maximum drawdown of -17.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBAE.DE and EUNA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XBAE.DEEUNA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.04%

-17.79%

-1.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.11%

-2.75%

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.58%

-4.02%

-0.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.29%

-17.03%

-1.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.88%

-8.66%

-2.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.91%

-6.76%

+0.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.11%

0.99%

+0.12%

Volatility

XBAE.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers II ESG Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF 5C EUR hedged (XBAE.DE) and iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE) have volatilities of 1.32% and 1.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XBAE.DEEUNA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.32%

1.35%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.86%

2.82%

+0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.46%

3.46%

0.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.00%

4.64%

+0.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.63%

4.27%

+0.36%

XBAE.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XBAE.DE and EUNA.DE have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XBAE.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XBAE.DE nor EUNA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XBAE.DE and EUNA.DE have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XBAE.DE and EUNA.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.

XBAE.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI Global Aggregate Sustainable and SRI Currency Neutral (EUR Hedged), while EUNA.DE tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XBAE.DE and EUNA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer