PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XBAE.DE vs. AHYD.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XBAE.DE vs. AHYD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers II ESG Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF 5C EUR hedged (XBAE.DE) and Amundi Global Aggregate SRI UCITS ETF Hedged EUR (AHYD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XBAE.DE achieves a 0.24% return, which is significantly higher than AHYD.DE's 0.14% return.


XBAE.DE

1D
0.10%
1M
0.82%
YTD
0.24%
6M
0.33%
1Y
1.30%
3Y*
1.91%
5Y*
-1.60%
10Y*
-0.51%

AHYD.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.90%
YTD
0.14%
6M
0.30%
1Y
0.78%
3Y*
1.80%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XBAE.DE vs. AHYD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XBAE.DE
Xtrackers II ESG Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF 5C EUR hedged
0.24%2.65%0.49%4.37%-3.14%
AHYD.DE
Amundi Global Aggregate SRI UCITS ETF Hedged EUR
0.14%2.02%0.67%4.41%-3.40%

Correlation

The correlation between XBAE.DE and AHYD.DE is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2022

0.82

The correlation between XBAE.DE and AHYD.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XBAE.DE vs. AHYD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XBAE.DE
XBAE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
XBAE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XBAE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
XBAE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
XBAE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
XBAE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

AHYD.DE
AHYD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
AHYD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AHYD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
AHYD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
AHYD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
AHYD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XBAE.DE vs. AHYD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II ESG Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF 5C EUR hedged (XBAE.DE) and Amundi Global Aggregate SRI UCITS ETF Hedged EUR (AHYD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XBAE.DEAHYD.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.04

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.42

0.23

+0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.10

0.61

+0.49

XBAE.DE vs. AHYD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XBAE.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is higher than the AHYD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XBAE.DE and AHYD.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XBAE.DE vs. AHYD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XBAE.DE drawdown since its inception was -19.06%, which is greater than AHYD.DE's maximum drawdown of -9.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBAE.DE and AHYD.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XBAE.DEAHYD.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.06%

-9.20%

-9.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.11%

-3.32%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.55%

-3.76%

-0.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.19%

-1.27%

-8.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.93%

-3.49%

-2.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.18%

1.27%

-0.09%

Volatility

XBAE.DE vs. AHYD.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers II ESG Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF 5C EUR hedged (XBAE.DE) is 0.86%, while Amundi Global Aggregate SRI UCITS ETF Hedged EUR (AHYD.DE) has a volatility of 1.19%. This indicates that XBAE.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AHYD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XBAE.DEAHYD.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.86%

1.19%

-0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.09%

3.17%

-0.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.63%

3.76%

-0.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.02%

4.76%

+0.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.64%

4.76%

-0.12%

XBAE.DE vs. AHYD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XBAE.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than AHYD.DE's 0.16% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XBAE.DE vs. AHYD.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XBAE.DE nor AHYD.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XBAE.DE and AHYD.DE have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XBAE.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XBAE.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for AHYD.DE.

XBAE.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI Global Aggregate Sustainable and SRI Currency Neutral (EUR Hedged), while AHYD.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI Global Aggregate 500MM ex Securitized Sustainable SRI Sector Neutral (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for XBAE.DE and 0.16% for AHYD.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XBAE.DE and AHYD.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer