PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XB4F.DE vs. JER5.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XB4F.DE vs. JER5.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond SRI PAB UCITS ETF (XB4F.DE) and JPMorgan EUR Corporate Bond 1-5 yr Research Enhanced Index (ESG) UCITS ETF (JER5.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XB4F.DE achieves a 0.35% return, which is significantly lower than JER5.DE's 0.53% return.


XB4F.DE

1D
0.04%
1M
-0.46%
6M
-0.05%
YTD
0.35%
1Y
1.07%
3Y*
4.08%
5Y*
-0.19%
10Y*
0.83%

JER5.DE

1D
-0.02%
1M
-0.24%
6M
0.26%
YTD
0.53%
1Y
1.47%
3Y*
4.17%
5Y*
1.11%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XB4F.DE vs. JER5.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XB4F.DE
Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond SRI PAB UCITS ETF
0.35%2.84%4.19%7.30%-13.32%-1.08%2.40%6.10%0.18%
JER5.DE
JPMorgan EUR Corporate Bond 1-5 yr Research Enhanced Index (ESG) UCITS ETF
0.53%3.43%4.31%6.23%-7.82%-0.26%0.74%2.43%0.24%

Correlation

The correlation between XB4F.DE and JER5.DE is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2018

0.80

The correlation between XB4F.DE and JER5.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.86 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XB4F.DE vs. JER5.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XB4F.DE
XB4F.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
XB4F.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XB4F.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
XB4F.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
XB4F.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
XB4F.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

JER5.DE
JER5.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
JER5.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JER5.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
JER5.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
JER5.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
JER5.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XB4F.DE vs. JER5.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond SRI PAB UCITS ETF (XB4F.DE) and JPMorgan EUR Corporate Bond 1-5 yr Research Enhanced Index (ESG) UCITS ETF (JER5.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XB4F.DEJER5.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.14

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.40

0.74

-0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.29

2.60

-1.31

XB4F.DE vs. JER5.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XB4F.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is lower than the JER5.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XB4F.DE and JER5.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XB4F.DE vs. JER5.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XB4F.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.97%, which is greater than JER5.DE's maximum drawdown of -10.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XB4F.DE and JER5.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XB4F.DEJER5.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.97%

-10.17%

-6.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.65%

-1.98%

-0.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.65%

-1.98%

-0.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.97%

-10.17%

-6.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.58%

-0.59%

-0.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.90%

-2.21%

-0.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.83%

0.56%

+0.27%

Volatility

XB4F.DE vs. JER5.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond SRI PAB UCITS ETF (XB4F.DE) has a higher volatility of 0.77% compared to JPMorgan EUR Corporate Bond 1-5 yr Research Enhanced Index (ESG) UCITS ETF (JER5.DE) at 0.57%. This indicates that XB4F.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JER5.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XB4F.DEJER5.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.77%

0.57%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.74%

1.79%

+0.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.18%

2.03%

+1.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.45%

2.56%

+1.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.13%

3.07%

+2.06%

XB4F.DE vs. JER5.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XB4F.DE has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is higher than JER5.DE's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XB4F.DE vs. JER5.DE - Dividend Comparison

XB4F.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.63%, while JER5.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
JER5.DE
JPMorgan EUR Corporate Bond 1-5 yr Research Enhanced Index (ESG) UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XB4F.DE
Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond SRI PAB UCITS ETF
2.63%2.44%2.59%1.66%1.30%2.23%0.43%0.59%0.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


XB4F.DE and JER5.DE have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JER5.DE is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JER5.DE is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for XB4F.DE.

XB4F.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI Euro Corporate SRI PAB, while JER5.DE tracks JP Morgan EUR Corporate Bond 1-5 Research Enhanced Index (ESG). They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for XB4F.DE and 0.04% for JER5.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XB4F.DE and JER5.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer