PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XB4F.DE vs. IEXA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XB4F.DE vs. IEXA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond SRI PAB UCITS ETF (XB4F.DE) and iShares EUR Corporate Bond ex-Financials UCITS ETF EUR Acc (IEXA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XB4F.DE achieves a 0.35% return, which is significantly lower than IEXA.DE's 0.56% return.


XB4F.DE

1D
0.04%
1M
-0.46%
6M
-0.05%
YTD
0.35%
1Y
1.07%
3Y*
4.08%
5Y*
-0.19%
10Y*
0.83%

IEXA.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.55%
6M
-0.00%
YTD
0.56%
1Y
1.12%
3Y*
3.77%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XB4F.DE vs. IEXA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XB4F.DE
Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond SRI PAB UCITS ETF
0.35%2.84%4.19%7.30%-5.45%
IEXA.DE
iShares EUR Corporate Bond ex-Financials UCITS ETF EUR Acc
0.56%2.47%3.54%7.38%-5.39%

Correlation

The correlation between XB4F.DE and IEXA.DE is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2022

0.88

The correlation between XB4F.DE and IEXA.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XB4F.DE vs. IEXA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XB4F.DE
XB4F.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
XB4F.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XB4F.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
XB4F.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
XB4F.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
XB4F.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

IEXA.DE
IEXA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
IEXA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEXA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEXA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
IEXA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEXA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XB4F.DE vs. IEXA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond SRI PAB UCITS ETF (XB4F.DE) and iShares EUR Corporate Bond ex-Financials UCITS ETF EUR Acc (IEXA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XB4F.DEIEXA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.07

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.40

0.43

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.29

1.38

-0.09

XB4F.DE vs. IEXA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XB4F.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is comparable to the IEXA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XB4F.DE and IEXA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XB4F.DE vs. IEXA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XB4F.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.97%, which is greater than IEXA.DE's maximum drawdown of -9.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XB4F.DE and IEXA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XB4F.DEIEXA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.97%

-9.06%

-7.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.65%

-2.56%

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.65%

-2.56%

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.58%

-0.73%

-0.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.90%

-2.21%

-0.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.83%

0.81%

+0.02%

Volatility

XB4F.DE vs. IEXA.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond SRI PAB UCITS ETF (XB4F.DE) has a higher volatility of 0.77% compared to iShares EUR Corporate Bond ex-Financials UCITS ETF EUR Acc (IEXA.DE) at 0.72%. This indicates that XB4F.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IEXA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XB4F.DEIEXA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.77%

0.72%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.74%

2.79%

-0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.18%

3.28%

-0.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.45%

4.74%

-0.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.13%

4.74%

+0.39%

XB4F.DE vs. IEXA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XB4F.DE has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than IEXA.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XB4F.DE vs. IEXA.DE - Dividend Comparison

XB4F.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.63%, while IEXA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
IEXA.DE
iShares EUR Corporate Bond ex-Financials UCITS ETF EUR Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XB4F.DE
Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond SRI PAB UCITS ETF
2.63%2.44%2.59%1.66%1.30%2.23%0.43%0.59%0.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


XB4F.DE and IEXA.DE have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XB4F.DE is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XB4F.DE is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IEXA.DE.

XB4F.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI Euro Corporate SRI PAB, while IEXA.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro Corporate ex-Financials Bond. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for XB4F.DE and 0.20% for IEXA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XB4F.DE and IEXA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer