PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XB vs. TAXM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XB vs. TAXM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx B Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XB) and BondBloxx IR+M Tax-Aware ETF for Massachusetts Residents (TAXM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XB achieves a 1.99% return, which is significantly higher than TAXM's 1.26% return.


XB

1D
0.17%
1M
0.64%
YTD
1.99%
6M
2.60%
1Y
7.31%
3Y*
8.50%
5Y*
10Y*

TAXM

1D
0.07%
1M
0.56%
YTD
1.26%
6M
1.58%
1Y
6.44%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XB vs. TAXM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XB and TAXM is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2025

0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XB vs. TAXM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XB
XB Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
XB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
XB Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
XB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
XB Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

TAXM
TAXM Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
TAXM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAXM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAXM Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
TAXM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAXM Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XB vs. TAXM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx B Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XB) and BondBloxx IR+M Tax-Aware ETF for Massachusetts Residents (TAXM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XBTAXMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.51

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.40

2.39

+1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.93

8.37

+6.56

XB vs. TAXM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XB Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the TAXM Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XB and TAXM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XBTAXMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.97

2.43

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

1.15

-0.30

Drawdowns

XB vs. TAXM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XB drawdown since its inception was -9.25%, which is greater than TAXM's maximum drawdown of -3.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XB and TAXM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XBTAXMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.25%

-3.10%

-6.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.16%

-2.70%

+0.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

-0.73%

+0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.32%

-0.71%

-0.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.49%

0.77%

-0.28%

Volatility

XB vs. TAXM - Volatility Comparison

BondBloxx B Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XB) has a higher volatility of 1.37% compared to BondBloxx IR+M Tax-Aware ETF for Massachusetts Residents (TAXM) at 0.94%. This indicates that XB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TAXM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XBTAXMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.37%

0.94%

+0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.97%

2.04%

+0.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.74%

2.67%

+1.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.44%

3.55%

+3.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.44%

3.55%

+3.89%

XB vs. TAXM - Expense Ratio Comparison

XB has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than TAXM's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

XB vs. TAXM - Dividend Comparison

XB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.07%, more than TAXM's 3.29% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
TAXM
BondBloxx IR+M Tax-Aware ETF for Massachusetts Residents
3.29%2.75%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XB
BondBloxx B Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
7.07%6.96%7.74%7.87%5.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


XB and TAXM have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XB has higher volatility (1.37%) compared to TAXM (0.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XB dropped -9.25% vs TAXM's -3.10%.

On 1-year performance, XB leads with 7.31% vs 6.44% for TAXM. On fees, XB is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, TAXM has been the lower-risk option at 0.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XB has performed better with a 7.31% return vs 6.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XB is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for TAXM.

XB has the higher dividend yield at 7.07%, compared with 3.29% for TAXM.

XB is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while TAXM is Municipal Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for XB and 0.35% for TAXM.

TAXM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XB and TAXM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer