XAXJ.L vs. XSTC.L
XAXJ.L (Xtrackers MSCI AC Asia ex Japan ESG Swap UCITS ETF 1C) and XSTC.L (Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D) are both exchange-traded funds - XAXJ.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD, while XSTC.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XAXJ.L returned 0.83%/yr vs 24.21%/yr for XSTC.L. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XAXJ.L charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for XSTC.L.
Performance
XAXJ.L vs. XSTC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XAXJ.L achieves a 1.72% return, which is significantly lower than XSTC.L's 23.32% return.
XAXJ.L
- 1D
- -1.69%
- 1M
- -0.01%
- YTD
- 1.72%
- 6M
- 0.31%
- 1Y
- 15.73%
- 3Y*
- 9.12%
- 5Y*
- 0.83%
- 10Y*
- 7.37%
XSTC.L
- 1D
- -2.13%
- 1M
- 14.77%
- YTD
- 23.32%
- 6M
- 22.05%
- 1Y
- 53.36%
- 3Y*
- 30.65%
- 5Y*
- 24.21%
- 10Y*
- —
XAXJ.L vs. XSTC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XAXJ.L Xtrackers MSCI AC Asia ex Japan ESG Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 1.72% | 20.48% | 10.76% | -8.18% | -10.59% | -4.15% | 20.15% | 12.59% | -6.24% |
XSTC.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D | 23.32% | 14.31% | 39.50% | 48.82% | -22.54% | 33.47% | 41.54% | 43.20% | 3.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between XAXJ.L and XSTC.L is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2018 | 0.52 |
The correlation between XAXJ.L and XSTC.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (3 years) to 0.52 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XAXJ.L vs. XSTC.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XAXJ.L
XSTC.L
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Utilities
-
Technology
XAXJ.L
XSTC.L
Industrials
XAXJ.L
XSTC.L
Financial Services
XAXJ.L
XSTC.L
Healthcare
XAXJ.L
XSTC.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
XAXJ.L
XSTC.L
-
Communication Services
XAXJ.L
XSTC.L
Real Estate
XAXJ.L
XSTC.L
-
Basic Materials
XAXJ.L
XSTC.L
-
Consumer Defensive
XAXJ.L
XSTC.L
-
Energy
XAXJ.L
XSTC.L
Utilities
XAXJ.L
XSTC.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XAXJ.L vs. XSTC.L — Risk / Return Rank
XAXJ.L
XSTC.L
XAXJ.L vs. XSTC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI AC Asia ex Japan ESG Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XAXJ.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XAXJ.L | XSTC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.44 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.43 | 3.04 | -1.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.85 | 7.79 | -3.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XAXJ.L | XSTC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.02 | 2.70 | -1.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | 1.09 | -1.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 1.14 | -0.67 |
Drawdowns
XAXJ.L vs. XSTC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XAXJ.L drawdown since its inception was -35.15%, which is greater than XSTC.L's maximum drawdown of -29.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAXJ.L and XSTC.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XAXJ.L | XSTC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.15% | -29.30% | -5.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.99% | -17.49% | +6.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.46% | -29.30% | +12.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.60% | -29.30% | -1.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.15% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.49% | -2.71% | -1.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.14% | -6.30% | -4.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.08% | 6.83% | -2.75% |
Volatility
XAXJ.L vs. XSTC.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI AC Asia ex Japan ESG Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XAXJ.L) is 5.96%, while Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L) has a volatility of 7.05%. This indicates that XAXJ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XSTC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XAXJ.L | XSTC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.96% | 7.05% | -1.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.72% | 14.45% | -2.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.42% | 19.63% | -4.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.81% | 22.22% | -4.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.23% | 22.43% | -4.20% |
XAXJ.L vs. XSTC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XAXJ.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XSTC.L's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
XAXJ.L vs. XSTC.L - Dividend Comparison
XAXJ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XSTC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XAXJ.L Xtrackers MSCI AC Asia ex Japan ESG Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XSTC.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D | 0.26% | 0.33% | 0.37% | 0.53% | 1.08% | 0.53% | 0.63% | 0.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XAXJ.L and XSTC.L have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XSTC.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XSTC.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for XAXJ.L.
XAXJ.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while XSTC.L is Technology Equities. XAXJ.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD, while XSTC.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for XAXJ.L and 0.12% for XSTC.L.
Find the right allocation for XAXJ.L and XSTC.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer