PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XAW.TO vs. DRFG.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XAW.TO vs. DRFG.TO

Last updated Jul 18, 2026
Documentation

XAW.TO (iShares Core MSCI All Country World ex Canada Index ETF) and DRFG.TO (Desjardins RI Global Multifactor Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF) are both Global Equities funds. XAW.TO is passively managed, while DRFG.TO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, XAW.TO returned 12.87%/yr vs 13.44%/yr for DRFG.TO. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

XAW.TO vs. DRFG.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI All Country World ex Canada Index ETF (XAW.TO) and Desjardins RI Global Multifactor Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF (DRFG.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XAW.TO achieves a 12.81% return, which is significantly lower than DRFG.TO's 13.90% return.

XAW.TO

1D
-1.14%
1M
-1.31%
6M
8.32%
YTD
12.81%
1Y
23.27%
3Y*
19.97%
5Y*
12.87%
10Y*
12.82%

DRFG.TO

1D
-0.94%
1M
-1.27%
6M
10.30%
YTD
13.90%
1Y
29.11%
3Y*
23.18%
5Y*
13.44%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XAW.TO vs. DRFG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XAW.TO
iShares Core MSCI All Country World ex Canada Index ETF		12.81%15.87%26.31%18.45%-11.83%18.39%12.37%10.06%
DRFG.TO
Desjardins RI Global Multifactor Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF		13.90%24.31%26.78%12.68%-12.16%17.99%7.88%8.78%

Correlation

The correlation between XAW.TO and DRFG.TO is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2019

0.49

Over the past year, XAW.TO and DRFG.TO have become more correlated (0.76) than their long-term average of 0.49, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Core MSCI All Country World ex Canada Index ETF

Desjardins RI Global Multifactor Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF

Often compared with XAW.TO:
XAW.TO vs. XEQT.TOXAW.TO vs. VXC.TOXAW.TO vs. VEQT.TOXAW.TO vs. XUU.TOXAW.TO vs. XIC.TOXAW.TO vs. XGRO.TOXAW.TO vs. VT
Often compared with DRFG.TO:
DRFG.TO vs. DANC.TODRFG.TO vs. DCG.TODRFG.TO vs. DCS.TODRFG.TO vs. DRFD.TODRFG.TO vs. DRFE.TODRFG.TO vs. DRFU.TODRFG.TO vs. DRMC.TO

Return for Risk

XAW.TO vs. DRFG.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XAW.TO
XAW.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
XAW.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XAW.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
XAW.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
XAW.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
XAW.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
DRFG.TO
DRFG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
DRFG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRFG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRFG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
DRFG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRFG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XAW.TO vs. DRFG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI All Country World ex Canada Index ETF (XAW.TO) and Desjardins RI Global Multifactor Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF (DRFG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

XAW.TODRFG.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.77
2.25

-0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.50
3.14

-0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.41

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.87

3.48

-0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.20

13.73

-2.53

XAW.TO vs. DRFG.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XAW.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the DRFG.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XAW.TO and DRFG.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XAW.TO vs. DRFG.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XAW.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.32%, roughly equal to the maximum DRFG.TO drawdown of -27.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAW.TO and DRFG.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XAW.TODRFG.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.32%

-27.73%

+0.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.16%

-8.40%

+0.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.66%

-16.44%

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.02%

-21.09%

+0.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.32%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.24%

-2.91%

-0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.88%

-4.62%

+0.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.08%

2.13%

-0.05%

Volatility

XAW.TO vs. DRFG.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI All Country World ex Canada Index ETF (XAW.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.82% compared to Desjardins RI Global Multifactor Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF (DRFG.TO) at 3.31%. This indicates that XAW.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRFG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XAW.TODRFG.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.82%

3.31%

+0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.08%

10.85%

+0.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.21%

12.99%

+0.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.76%

12.73%

+1.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.09%

14.24%

+0.85%

Dividends

XAW.TO vs. DRFG.TO - Dividend Comparison

XAW.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, less than DRFG.TO's 1.57% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DRFG.TO
Desjardins RI Global Multifactor Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF		1.57%2.14%1.40%1.49%1.58%1.37%1.59%1.68%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XAW.TO
iShares Core MSCI All Country World ex Canada Index ETF		1.23%1.33%1.61%1.71%1.79%1.77%1.49%2.02%2.28%1.94%1.79%1.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

XAW.TO and DRFG.TO have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Desjardins.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XAW.TO and DRFG.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer