XAUS.L vs. XNNS.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XAUS.L (Xtrackers S&P/ASX 200 UCITS ETF 1D) and XNNS.L (Xtrackers MSCI Innovation UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XAUS.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Australia NR USD, while XNNS.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Both are passively managed. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XAUS.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XNNS.L.

Performance

XAUS.L vs. XNNS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P/ASX 200 UCITS ETF 1D (XAUS.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XNNS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

XAUS.L is traded in GBp, while XNNS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the XNNS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

XAUS.L

• 1D: -0.60%
• 1M: -1.99%
• YTD: 8.13%
• 6M: 9.31%
• 1Y: 15.67%
• 3Y*: 9.59%
• 5Y*: 6.41%
• 10Y*: 9.17%

XNNS.L

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XAUS.L vs. XNNS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
XAUS.L Xtrackers S&P/ASX 200 UCITS ETF 1D	8.13%	9.45%	3.36%	5.67%	4.66%
XNNS.L Xtrackers MSCI Innovation UCITS ETF 1C	-7.92%	6.27%	24.09%	26.71%	-12.09%

Correlation

The correlation between XAUS.L and XNNS.L is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 21, 2022	0.55

The correlation between XAUS.L and XNNS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XAUS.L vs. XNNS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XAUS.L

XAUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 35
XAUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
XAUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
XAUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 35
XAUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
XAUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XAUS.L vs. XNNS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P/ASX 200 UCITS ETF 1D (XAUS.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XNNS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XAUS.L	XNNS.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.27	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.86	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.72	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.19	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XAUS.L	XNNS.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.27	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.38	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	XAUS.L	XNNS.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.15%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.57%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.54%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.54%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.31%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.18%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.06%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.14%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XAUS.L	XNNS.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.33%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.24%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.00%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.76%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.45%	—	—

XAUS.L vs. XNNS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XAUS.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XNNS.L's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

XAUS.L vs. XNNS.L - Dividend Comparison

XAUS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, while XNNS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
XAUS.L Xtrackers S&P/ASX 200 UCITS ETF 1D	2.54%	2.67%	3.22%	3.83%	5.17%	2.15%	4.85%	3.73%	3.53%	3.49%	3.73%
XNNS.L Xtrackers MSCI Innovation UCITS ETF 1C	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XAUS.L and XNNS.L in my portfolio?

XAUS.L and XNNS.L have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XAUS.L or XNNS.L?

On fees, XNNS.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XAUS.L or XNNS.L?

XNNS.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for XAUS.L.

What is the main difference between XAUS.L and XNNS.L?

XAUS.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while XNNS.L is Technology Equities. XAUS.L tracks MSCI Australia NR USD, while XNNS.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XAUS.L and 0.35% for XNNS.L.