PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XAUG vs. APRH
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XAUG vs. APRH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - August (XAUG) and Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - April (APRH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XAUG vs. APRH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XAUG achieves a -0.84% return, which is significantly lower than APRH's 0.87% return.


XAUG

1D
1.38%
1M
-1.45%
YTD
-0.84%
6M
1.02%
1Y
8.86%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

APRH

1D
-0.00%
1M
0.28%
YTD
0.87%
6M
1.15%
1Y
5.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XAUG vs. APRH - Expense Ratio Comparison

XAUG has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than APRH's 0.79% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XAUG vs. APRH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XAUG
XAUG Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
XAUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XAUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
XAUG Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
XAUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
XAUG Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

APRH
APRH Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
APRH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APRH Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
APRH Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
APRH Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
APRH Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XAUG vs. APRH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - August (XAUG) and Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - April (APRH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XAUGAPRHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.96

0.81

+0.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.48

1.26

+0.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.31

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.30

0.96

+0.34

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.18

6.35

+1.82

XAUG vs. APRH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XAUG Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is comparable to the APRH Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XAUG and APRH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XAUGAPRHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

0.81

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.32

1.50

-0.18

Correlation

The correlation between XAUG and APRH is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

XAUG vs. APRH - Dividend Comparison

XAUG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while APRH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.55%.


Drawdowns

XAUG vs. APRH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XAUG drawdown since its inception was -8.70%, which is greater than APRH's maximum drawdown of -5.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAUG and APRH.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XAUGAPRHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.70%

-5.87%

-2.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.13%

-5.83%

-1.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.77%

-0.21%

-1.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.49%

-0.22%

-0.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.13%

0.89%

+0.24%

Volatility

XAUG vs. APRH - Volatility Comparison

FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - August (XAUG) has a higher volatility of 2.64% compared to Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - April (APRH) at 0.59%. This indicates that XAUG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APRH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XAUGAPRHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.64%

0.59%

+2.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.87%

1.56%

+2.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.24%

6.89%

+2.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.67%

4.62%

+2.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.67%

4.62%

+2.05%