XASX.L vs. XSTC.L
XASX.L (Xtrackers MSCI UK ESG UCITS ETF 1D) and XSTC.L (Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D) are both exchange-traded funds - XASX.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while XSTC.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XASX.L returned 4.82%/yr vs 24.21%/yr for XSTC.L. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XASX.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for XSTC.L.
Performance
XASX.L vs. XSTC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XASX.L achieves a 1.94% return, which is significantly lower than XSTC.L's 23.32% return.
XASX.L
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 1.58%
- YTD
- 1.94%
- 6M
- 5.31%
- 1Y
- 10.51%
- 3Y*
- 7.93%
- 5Y*
- 4.82%
- 10Y*
- 3.34%
XSTC.L
- 1D
- -2.13%
- 1M
- 14.77%
- YTD
- 23.32%
- 6M
- 22.05%
- 1Y
- 53.36%
- 3Y*
- 30.65%
- 5Y*
- 24.21%
- 10Y*
- —
XASX.L vs. XSTC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XASX.L Xtrackers MSCI UK ESG UCITS ETF 1D | 1.94% | 17.10% | 6.61% | 4.99% | -9.18% | 10.11% | -15.64% | 14.63% | -7.64% |
XSTC.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D | 23.32% | 14.31% | 39.50% | 48.82% | -22.54% | 33.47% | 41.54% | 43.20% | 3.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between XASX.L and XSTC.L is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2018 | 0.44 |
The correlation between XASX.L and XSTC.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.44 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XASX.L vs. XSTC.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XASX.L
XSTC.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
Energy
Financial Services
XASX.L
XSTC.L
Industrials
XASX.L
XSTC.L
Healthcare
XASX.L
XSTC.L
-
Basic Materials
XASX.L
XSTC.L
-
Consumer Defensive
XASX.L
XSTC.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
XASX.L
XSTC.L
-
Communication Services
XASX.L
XSTC.L
Utilities
XASX.L
XSTC.L
-
Real Estate
XASX.L
XSTC.L
-
Technology
XASX.L
XSTC.L
Energy
XASX.L
XSTC.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XASX.L vs. XSTC.L — Risk / Return Rank
XASX.L
XSTC.L
XASX.L vs. XSTC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI UK ESG UCITS ETF 1D (XASX.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XASX.L | XSTC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.44 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.83 | 3.04 | -2.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.57 | 7.79 | -5.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XASX.L | XSTC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 | 2.70 | -1.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 1.09 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 1.14 | -1.03 |
Drawdowns
XASX.L vs. XSTC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XASX.L drawdown since its inception was -47.36%, which is greater than XSTC.L's maximum drawdown of -29.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XASX.L and XSTC.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XASX.L | XSTC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.36% | -29.30% | -18.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.54% | -17.49% | +4.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.67% | -29.30% | +16.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.21% | -29.30% | +11.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.87% | -2.71% | -4.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.90% | -6.30% | -4.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.09% | 6.83% | -2.74% |
Volatility
XASX.L vs. XSTC.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI UK ESG UCITS ETF 1D (XASX.L) is 4.23%, while Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L) has a volatility of 7.05%. This indicates that XASX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XSTC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XASX.L | XSTC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.23% | 7.05% | -2.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.99% | 14.45% | -3.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.54% | 19.63% | -7.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.44% | 22.22% | -8.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.36% | 22.43% | -7.07% |
XASX.L vs. XSTC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XASX.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than XSTC.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XASX.L vs. XSTC.L - Dividend Comparison
XASX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than XSTC.L's 0.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XASX.L Xtrackers MSCI UK ESG UCITS ETF 1D | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.03% | 0.06% | 0.03% | 0.06% | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.00% |
XSTC.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D | 0.26% | 0.33% | 0.37% | 0.53% | 1.08% | 0.53% | 0.63% | 0.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XASX.L and XSTC.L have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XSTC.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XSTC.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for XASX.L.
XASX.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while XSTC.L is Technology Equities. XASX.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while XSTC.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for XASX.L and 0.12% for XSTC.L.
Find the right allocation for XASX.L and XSTC.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer