PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XASX.L vs. IEDL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XASX.L vs. IEDL.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XASX.L (Xtrackers MSCI UK ESG UCITS ETF 1D) and IEDL.L (iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)) are both Europe Equities funds - XASX.L tracks the FTSE AllSh TR GBP while IEDL.L tracks the MSCI Europe Value NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XASX.L returned 4.82%/yr vs 14.62%/yr for IEDL.L. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XASX.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IEDL.L.

Performance

XASX.L vs. IEDL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI UK ESG UCITS ETF 1D (XASX.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IEDL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XASX.L is traded in GBp, while IEDL.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the IEDL.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XASX.L achieves a 1.94% return, which is significantly lower than IEDL.L's 13.19% return.

XASX.L

1D
0.45%
1M
1.58%
YTD
1.94%
6M
5.31%
1Y
10.51%
3Y*
7.93%
5Y*
4.82%
10Y*
3.34%

IEDL.L

1D
0.03%
1M
4.86%
YTD
13.19%
6M
15.86%
1Y
36.33%
3Y*
21.75%
5Y*
14.62%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XASX.L vs. IEDL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XASX.L
Xtrackers MSCI UK ESG UCITS ETF 1D		1.94%17.10%6.61%4.99%-9.18%10.11%-15.64%14.63%-9.07%
IEDL.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)		13.19%42.22%5.44%11.24%1.22%19.20%-3.60%14.87%-10.37%

Correlation

The correlation between XASX.L and IEDL.L is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2018

0.79

The correlation between XASX.L and IEDL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

XASX.L vs. IEDL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XASX.L
IEDL.L

Financial Services

32.1%
22.6%

Industrials

17.8%
17.0%

Healthcare

11.9%
12.3%

Basic Materials

10.9%
6.2%

Consumer Defensive

10.8%
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

6.7%
6.2%

Communication Services

4.7%
3.7%

Utilities

2.0%
4.5%

Real Estate

2.0%
0.6%

Technology

0.8%
12.2%

Energy

0.1%
5.1%

Financial Services

XASX.L
32.1%
IEDL.L
22.6%

Industrials

XASX.L
17.8%
IEDL.L
17.0%

Healthcare

XASX.L
11.9%
IEDL.L
12.3%

Basic Materials

XASX.L
10.9%
IEDL.L
6.2%

Consumer Defensive

XASX.L
10.8%
IEDL.L
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

XASX.L
6.7%
IEDL.L
6.2%

Communication Services

XASX.L
4.7%
IEDL.L
3.7%

Utilities

XASX.L
2.0%
IEDL.L
4.5%

Real Estate

XASX.L
2.0%
IEDL.L
0.6%

Technology

XASX.L
0.8%
IEDL.L
12.2%

Energy

XASX.L
0.1%
IEDL.L
5.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Xtrackers MSCI UK ESG UCITS ETF 1D

iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)

Often compared with XASX.L:
XASX.L vs. LGUK.LXASX.L vs. LCUK.LXASX.L vs. MSED.LXASX.L vs. VUKG.LXASX.L vs. EEIP.LXASX.L vs. IMV.LXASX.L vs. LCPE.L
Often compared with IEDL.L:
IEDL.L vs. S7XP.LIEDL.L vs. XHYG.DEIEDL.L vs. MVEW.DEIEDL.L vs. T3KE.DEIEDL.L vs. EUMD.LIEDL.L vs. CNX1.LIEDL.L vs. VEUR.L

Return for Risk

XASX.L vs. IEDL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XASX.L
XASX.L Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
XASX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XASX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
XASX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
XASX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
XASX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
IEDL.L
IEDL.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
IEDL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEDL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEDL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
IEDL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEDL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XASX.L vs. IEDL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI UK ESG UCITS ETF 1D (XASX.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IEDL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XASX.LIEDL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.83
2.68

-1.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.23
3.61

-2.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.48

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.83

3.43

-2.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.57

12.68

-10.12

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XASX.L vs. IEDL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XASX.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is lower than the IEDL.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XASX.L and IEDL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XASX.LIEDL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

2.68

-1.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.95

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

0.59

-0.48

Drawdowns

XASX.L vs. IEDL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XASX.L drawdown since its inception was -47.36%, which is greater than IEDL.L's maximum drawdown of -34.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XASX.L and IEDL.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XASX.LIEDL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.36%

-34.37%

-12.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.54%

-10.54%

-2.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.67%

-16.23%

+3.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.21%

-16.28%

-1.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.97%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.87%

-0.80%

-6.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.90%

-5.72%

-5.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.09%

2.86%

+1.23%

Volatility

XASX.L vs. IEDL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI UK ESG UCITS ETF 1D (XASX.L) is 4.23%, while iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IEDL.L) has a volatility of 4.75%. This indicates that XASX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEDL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XASX.LIEDL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.23%

4.75%

-0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.99%

11.06%

-0.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.54%

13.48%

-0.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.44%

15.30%

-1.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.36%

17.59%

-2.23%

XASX.L vs. IEDL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XASX.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than IEDL.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XASX.L vs. IEDL.L - Dividend Comparison

XASX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than IEDL.L's 3.01% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IEDL.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)		3.01%3.44%4.22%4.76%4.23%3.56%2.32%3.86%3.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XASX.L
Xtrackers MSCI UK ESG UCITS ETF 1D		0.03%0.03%0.04%0.03%0.06%0.03%0.06%0.04%0.04%0.04%0.04%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

XASX.L and IEDL.L have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XASX.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XASX.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IEDL.L.

XASX.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while IEDL.L tracks MSCI Europe Value NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for XASX.L and 0.25% for IEDL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XASX.L and IEDL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer