PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XAMB.DE vs. WRLD.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XAMB.DE vs. WRLD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI World SRI Climate Net Zero Ambition PAB UCITS ETF Acc (XAMB.DE) and Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF (WRLD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XAMB.DE achieves a 13.11% return, which is significantly lower than WRLD.DE's 18.45% return.


XAMB.DE

1D
0.27%
1M
6.31%
YTD
13.11%
6M
13.74%
1Y
20.74%
3Y*
12.56%
5Y*
10.09%
10Y*

WRLD.DE

1D
-0.10%
1M
1.70%
YTD
18.45%
6M
19.64%
1Y
28.36%
3Y*
10.05%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XAMB.DE vs. WRLD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XAMB.DE
Amundi MSCI World SRI Climate Net Zero Ambition PAB UCITS ETF Acc
13.11%2.25%15.42%20.65%-17.81%14.63%
WRLD.DE
Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF
18.45%11.71%1.59%11.63%-16.39%8.00%

Correlation

The correlation between XAMB.DE and WRLD.DE is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2021

0.80

The correlation between XAMB.DE and WRLD.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XAMB.DE vs. WRLD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XAMB.DE
XAMB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
XAMB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XAMB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
XAMB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
XAMB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
XAMB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

WRLD.DE
WRLD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
WRLD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WRLD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
WRLD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
WRLD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
WRLD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XAMB.DE vs. WRLD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI World SRI Climate Net Zero Ambition PAB UCITS ETF Acc (XAMB.DE) and Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF (WRLD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XAMB.DEWRLD.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.34

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

3.57

-1.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.16

11.33

-2.17

XAMB.DE vs. WRLD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XAMB.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the WRLD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XAMB.DE and WRLD.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XAMB.DEWRLD.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.57

1.91

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.38

+0.36

Drawdowns

XAMB.DE vs. WRLD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XAMB.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.83%, which is greater than WRLD.DE's maximum drawdown of -23.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAMB.DE and WRLD.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XAMB.DEWRLD.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.83%

-23.55%

-8.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.28%

-7.90%

-0.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.09%

-19.51%

-2.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.38%

+0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.61%

-9.51%

+3.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.26%

2.50%

-0.24%

Volatility

XAMB.DE vs. WRLD.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi MSCI World SRI Climate Net Zero Ambition PAB UCITS ETF Acc (XAMB.DE) is 3.89%, while Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF (WRLD.DE) has a volatility of 4.50%. This indicates that XAMB.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WRLD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XAMB.DEWRLD.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.89%

4.50%

-0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.82%

11.34%

-1.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.16%

14.81%

-1.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.94%

16.98%

-2.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.40%

16.98%

-0.58%

XAMB.DE vs. WRLD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XAMB.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than WRLD.DE's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

XAMB.DE vs. WRLD.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XAMB.DE nor WRLD.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XAMB.DE and WRLD.DE have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XAMB.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XAMB.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for WRLD.DE.

XAMB.DE tracks MSCI World SRI Filtered PAB, while WRLD.DE tracks Foxberry SMS Environmental Impact 100. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for XAMB.DE and 0.55% for WRLD.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XAMB.DE and WRLD.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer