XAMB.DE vs. LYMS.DE
XAMB.DE (Amundi MSCI World SRI Climate Net Zero Ambition PAB UCITS ETF Acc) and LYMS.DE (Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - XAMB.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World SRI Filtered PAB, while LYMS.DE is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq 100®. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XAMB.DE returned 10.09%/yr vs 18.88%/yr for LYMS.DE. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XAMB.DE charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for LYMS.DE.
Performance
XAMB.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XAMB.DE achieves a 13.11% return, which is significantly lower than LYMS.DE's 20.63% return.
XAMB.DE
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 6.31%
- YTD
- 13.11%
- 6M
- 13.74%
- 1Y
- 20.74%
- 3Y*
- 12.56%
- 5Y*
- 10.09%
- 10Y*
- —
LYMS.DE
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 9.25%
- YTD
- 20.63%
- 6M
- 19.42%
- 1Y
- 37.94%
- 3Y*
- 24.71%
- 5Y*
- 18.88%
- 10Y*
- 21.41%
XAMB.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XAMB.DE Amundi MSCI World SRI Climate Net Zero Ambition PAB UCITS ETF Acc | 13.11% | 2.25% | 15.42% | 20.65% | -17.81% | 36.43% | 7.63% | 32.88% | -7.35% |
LYMS.DE Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc | 20.63% | 7.15% | 33.72% | 51.52% | -29.87% | 39.59% | 34.60% | 42.84% | -11.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between XAMB.DE and LYMS.DE is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2018 | 0.85 |
The correlation between XAMB.DE and LYMS.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XAMB.DE vs. LYMS.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XAMB.DE
LYMS.DE
XAMB.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI World SRI Climate Net Zero Ambition PAB UCITS ETF Acc (XAMB.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XAMB.DE | LYMS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.42 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | 3.77 | -1.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.16 | 11.23 | -2.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XAMB.DE | LYMS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.57 | 2.40 | -0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 | 0.94 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.08 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.77 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
XAMB.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XAMB.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.83%, smaller than the maximum LYMS.DE drawdown of -50.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAMB.DE and LYMS.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XAMB.DE | LYMS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.83% | -50.00% | +18.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.28% | -10.02% | +1.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.09% | -26.74% | +4.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.09% | -31.12% | +9.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.86% | +0.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.61% | -8.78% | +3.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.26% | 3.37% | -1.11% |
Volatility
XAMB.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi MSCI World SRI Climate Net Zero Ambition PAB UCITS ETF Acc (XAMB.DE) is 3.89%, while Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE) has a volatility of 4.37%. This indicates that XAMB.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LYMS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XAMB.DE | LYMS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.89% | 4.37% | -0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.82% | 10.99% | -1.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.16% | 15.73% | -2.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.94% | 19.91% | -4.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.40% | 19.68% | -3.28% |
XAMB.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XAMB.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than LYMS.DE's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XAMB.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XAMB.DE nor LYMS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LYMS.DE Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.65% | 0.69% | 0.76% | 1.09% | 1.18% |
XAMB.DE Amundi MSCI World SRI Climate Net Zero Ambition PAB UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XAMB.DE and LYMS.DE have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XAMB.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XAMB.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for LYMS.DE.
XAMB.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while LYMS.DE is Nasdaq-100. XAMB.DE tracks MSCI World SRI Filtered PAB, while LYMS.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for XAMB.DE and 0.22% for LYMS.DE.
Find the right allocation for XAMB.DE and LYMS.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer