PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XAIX.DE vs. CEMS.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XAIX.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence & Big Data UCITS ETF (XAIX.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (CEMS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XAIX.DE achieves a 32.20% return, which is significantly higher than CEMS.DE's 14.37% return.


XAIX.DE

1D
3.39%
1M
7.41%
YTD
32.20%
6M
35.31%
1Y
54.48%
3Y*
33.45%
5Y*
20.87%
10Y*

CEMS.DE

1D
2.48%
1M
3.42%
YTD
14.37%
6M
17.13%
1Y
32.78%
3Y*
21.17%
5Y*
14.39%
10Y*
11.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XAIX.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XAIX.DE
Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence & Big Data UCITS ETF
32.20%15.25%34.63%63.77%-31.80%35.85%24.44%6.39%
CEMS.DE
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF
14.37%36.00%9.92%13.88%-4.51%26.64%-8.83%16.12%

Correlation

The correlation between XAIX.DE and CEMS.DE is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2019

0.55

The correlation between XAIX.DE and CEMS.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (3 years) to 0.55 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XAIX.DE vs. CEMS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XAIX.DE
XAIX.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
XAIX.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XAIX.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
XAIX.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
XAIX.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
XAIX.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

CEMS.DE
CEMS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
CEMS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEMS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEMS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
CEMS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEMS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XAIX.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence & Big Data UCITS ETF (XAIX.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (CEMS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XAIX.DECEMS.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.41

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.48

3.26

+1.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.35

12.19

+0.15

XAIX.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XAIX.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is comparable to the CEMS.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XAIX.DE and CEMS.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XAIX.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XAIX.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.08%, smaller than the maximum CEMS.DE drawdown of -40.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAIX.DE and CEMS.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XAIX.DECEMS.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.08%

-40.22%

+7.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.10%

-10.02%

-2.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.61%

-17.61%

-10.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.08%

-19.56%

-13.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.65%

-0.66%

-5.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.63%

-7.50%

-0.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.40%

2.68%

+1.72%

Volatility

XAIX.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence & Big Data UCITS ETF (XAIX.DE) has a higher volatility of 9.60% compared to iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (CEMS.DE) at 4.88%. This indicates that XAIX.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEMS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XAIX.DECEMS.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.60%

4.88%

+4.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.26%

11.54%

+5.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.31%

14.15%

+7.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.90%

15.31%

+5.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.77%

17.46%

+4.31%

XAIX.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XAIX.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than CEMS.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

XAIX.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XAIX.DE nor CEMS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XAIX.DE and CEMS.DE have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CEMS.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CEMS.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XAIX.DE.

XAIX.DE is categorized as Technology Equities, while CEMS.DE is Europe Equities. XAIX.DE tracks Nasdaq Global Artificial Intelligence and Big Data, while CEMS.DE tracks MSCI Europe Enhanced Value. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XAIX.DE and 0.25% for CEMS.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XAIX.DE and CEMS.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer