PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XAID.L vs. FOGB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XAID.L vs. FOGB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence & Big Data UCITS ETF 1C (XAID.L) and Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD (FOGB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XAID.L is traded in USD, while FOGB.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FOGB.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XAID.L achieves a 28.06% return, which is significantly higher than FOGB.L's 4.43% return.


XAID.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-4.81%
6M
28.21%
YTD
28.06%
1Y
44.66%
3Y*
33.57%
5Y*
19.61%
10Y*

FOGB.L

1D
0.00%
1M
2.01%
6M
-0.60%
YTD
4.43%
1Y
-3.10%
3Y*
-3.83%
5Y*
-8.94%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XAID.L vs. FOGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XAID.L
Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence & Big Data UCITS ETF 1C
28.06%29.99%27.58%67.18%-35.60%25.35%18.51%
FOGB.L
Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD
4.43%-2.66%-7.29%-2.07%-26.99%1.63%12.29%

Correlation

The correlation between XAID.L and FOGB.L is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2020

0.52

Over the past year, the correlation between XAID.L and FOGB.L has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.52, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XAID.L vs. FOGB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XAID.L
XAID.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
XAID.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XAID.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
XAID.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
XAID.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
XAID.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

FOGB.L
FOGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
FOGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
FOGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XAID.L vs. FOGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence & Big Data UCITS ETF 1C (XAID.L) and Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD (FOGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XAID.LFOGB.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

0.99

+0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.47

-0.12

+3.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.87

-0.21

+10.09

XAID.L vs. FOGB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XAID.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is higher than the FOGB.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XAID.L and FOGB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XAID.L vs. FOGB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XAID.L drawdown since its inception was -41.08%, smaller than the maximum FOGB.L drawdown of -47.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAID.L and FOGB.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XAID.LFOGB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.08%

-47.61%

+6.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.81%

-15.90%

+3.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.00%

-23.99%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.08%

-47.61%

+6.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.93%

-40.01%

+31.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.18%

-28.74%

+20.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.51%

8.83%

-4.32%

Volatility

XAID.L vs. FOGB.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence & Big Data UCITS ETF 1C (XAID.L) has a higher volatility of 9.38% compared to Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD (FOGB.L) at 3.95%. This indicates that XAID.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FOGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XAID.LFOGB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.38%

3.95%

+5.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.62%

11.30%

+9.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.69%

15.97%

+7.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.52%

18.14%

+7.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.41%

17.70%

+6.71%

XAID.L vs. FOGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XAID.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FOGB.L's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

XAID.L vs. FOGB.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XAID.L nor FOGB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XAID.L and FOGB.L have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XAID.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XAID.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FOGB.L.

XAID.L tracks Nasdaq Global Artificial Intelligence and Big Data Index, while FOGB.L tracks Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Rize ETF. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XAID.L and 0.45% for FOGB.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XAID.L and FOGB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer