XAGG vs. PRAB
XAGG (Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF) and PRAB (State Street IG Public & Private ABS ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XAGG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for PRAB.
Performance
XAGG vs. PRAB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
XAGG
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.45%
- 6M
- 1.69%
- YTD
- 2.53%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PRAB
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XAGG vs. PRAB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
XAGG Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF | 1.38% |
PRAB State Street IG Public & Private ABS ETF | 0.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between XAGG and PRAB is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2026 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XAGG vs. PRAB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF (XAGG) and State Street IG Public & Private ABS ETF (PRAB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XAGG vs. PRAB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XAGG drawdown since its inception was -2.88%, which is greater than PRAB's maximum drawdown of -0.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAGG and PRAB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XAGG | PRAB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.88% | -0.48% | -2.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.15% | -0.06% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.53% | -0.08% | -0.45% |
Volatility
XAGG vs. PRAB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XAGG | PRAB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.45% | 1.12% | +2.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.45% | 1.12% | +2.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.45% | 1.12% | +2.33% |
XAGG vs. PRAB - Expense Ratio Comparison
XAGG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than PRAB's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
XAGG vs. PRAB - Dividend Comparison
XAGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.45%, more than PRAB's 1.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
PRAB State Street IG Public & Private ABS ETF | 1.49% | 0.00% |
XAGG Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF | 4.45% | 1.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XAGG and PRAB have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PRAB is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PRAB is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for XAGG.
XAGG has the higher dividend yield at 4.45%, compared with 1.49% for PRAB.
They also come from different issuers: Eaton Vance and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XAGG and 0.39% for PRAB.
Find the right allocation for XAGG and PRAB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer