PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
X7PS.L vs. MIBX.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

X7PS.L vs. MIBX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco STOXX Europe 600 Optimised Banks UCITS ETF (X7PS.L) and Lyxor FTSE MIB UCITS ETF - Dist (MIBX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

X7PS.L is traded in EUR, while MIBX.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the MIBX.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, X7PS.L achieves a 17.93% return, which is significantly lower than MIBX.L's 21.37% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with X7PS.L having a 16.30% annualized return and MIBX.L not far behind at 16.20%.


X7PS.L

1D
0.13%
1M
6.39%
6M
14.44%
YTD
17.93%
1Y
53.36%
3Y*
44.72%
5Y*
32.08%
10Y*
16.30%

MIBX.L

1D
0.45%
1M
2.45%
6M
18.99%
YTD
21.37%
1Y
38.10%
3Y*
28.34%
5Y*
21.74%
10Y*
16.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

X7PS.L vs. MIBX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
X7PS.L
Invesco STOXX Europe 600 Optimised Banks UCITS ETF
17.93%78.30%33.17%25.70%0.44%38.22%-22.81%13.99%-26.23%11.67%
MIBX.L
Lyxor FTSE MIB UCITS ETF - Dist
21.37%36.28%18.63%33.38%-8.51%25.85%-4.02%33.11%-13.80%16.36%

Correlation

The correlation between X7PS.L and MIBX.L is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2011

0.77

The correlation between X7PS.L and MIBX.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

X7PS.L vs. MIBX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

X7PS.L
X7PS.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
X7PS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
X7PS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
X7PS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
X7PS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
X7PS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

MIBX.L
MIBX.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
MIBX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIBX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIBX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
MIBX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIBX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

X7PS.L vs. MIBX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco STOXX Europe 600 Optimised Banks UCITS ETF (X7PS.L) and Lyxor FTSE MIB UCITS ETF - Dist (MIBX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


X7PS.LMIBX.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.44

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.24

3.99

-0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.66

14.41

-3.75

X7PS.L vs. MIBX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current X7PS.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the MIBX.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of X7PS.L and MIBX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

X7PS.L vs. MIBX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum X7PS.L drawdown since its inception was -60.64%, smaller than the maximum MIBX.L drawdown of -73.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for X7PS.L and MIBX.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


X7PS.LMIBX.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.64%

-73.32%

+12.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.49%

-9.30%

-7.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.14%

-17.57%

-2.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.70%

-24.99%

-4.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.51%

-40.94%

-15.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.94%

0.00%

-0.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.85%

-45.88%

+28.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.02%

2.58%

+2.44%

Volatility

X7PS.L vs. MIBX.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco STOXX Europe 600 Optimised Banks UCITS ETF (X7PS.L) has a higher volatility of 5.45% compared to Lyxor FTSE MIB UCITS ETF - Dist (MIBX.L) at 3.74%. This indicates that X7PS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MIBX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


X7PS.LMIBX.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.45%

3.74%

+1.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.89%

12.37%

+6.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.39%

15.18%

+7.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.71%

18.08%

+5.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.86%

19.03%

+5.83%

X7PS.L vs. MIBX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

X7PS.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than MIBX.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

X7PS.L vs. MIBX.L - Dividend Comparison

X7PS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MIBX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MIBX.L
Lyxor FTSE MIB UCITS ETF - Dist
3.11%3.68%3.93%3.73%3.88%2.09%1.55%4.02%4.05%2.75%3.56%3.05%
X7PS.L
Invesco STOXX Europe 600 Optimised Banks UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


X7PS.L and MIBX.L have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, X7PS.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

X7PS.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for MIBX.L.

X7PS.L tracks Invesco STOXX Europe 600 Optimised Banks UCITS ETF, while MIBX.L tracks FTSE Italia AllShare TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for X7PS.L and 0.35% for MIBX.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for X7PS.L and MIBX.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer