PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
X7PS.L vs. EQQU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

X7PS.L vs. EQQU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco STOXX Europe 600 Optimised Banks UCITS ETF (X7PS.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

X7PS.L is traded in EUR, while EQQU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EQQU.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with X7PS.L having a 17.93% return and EQQU.L slightly higher at 18.62%. Over the past 10 years, X7PS.L has underperformed EQQU.L with an annualized return of 16.30%, while EQQU.L has yielded a comparatively higher 20.53% annualized return.


X7PS.L

1D
0.13%
1M
6.39%
6M
14.44%
YTD
17.93%
1Y
53.36%
3Y*
44.72%
5Y*
32.08%
10Y*
16.30%

EQQU.L

1D
-1.16%
1M
-2.50%
6M
17.79%
YTD
18.62%
1Y
29.82%
3Y*
22.91%
5Y*
15.93%
10Y*
20.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

X7PS.L vs. EQQU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
X7PS.L
Invesco STOXX Europe 600 Optimised Banks UCITS ETF
17.93%78.30%33.17%25.70%0.44%38.22%-22.81%13.99%-26.23%11.67%
EQQU.L
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF
18.62%5.54%34.89%51.58%-29.33%37.52%36.10%41.14%3.58%15.68%

Correlation

The correlation between X7PS.L and EQQU.L is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2015

0.39

The correlation between X7PS.L and EQQU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (3 years) to 0.44 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

X7PS.L vs. EQQU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

X7PS.L
X7PS.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
X7PS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
X7PS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
X7PS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
X7PS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
X7PS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

EQQU.L
EQQU.L Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
EQQU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQQU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQQU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
EQQU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQQU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

X7PS.L vs. EQQU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco STOXX Europe 600 Optimised Banks UCITS ETF (X7PS.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


X7PS.LEQQU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.30

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.24

2.87

+0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.66

8.28

+2.38

X7PS.L vs. EQQU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current X7PS.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is higher than the EQQU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of X7PS.L and EQQU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

X7PS.L vs. EQQU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum X7PS.L drawdown since its inception was -60.64%, which is greater than EQQU.L's maximum drawdown of -31.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for X7PS.L and EQQU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


X7PS.LEQQU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.64%

-31.40%

-29.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.49%

-10.34%

-6.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.14%

-25.80%

+5.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.70%

-31.40%

+1.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.51%

-31.40%

-25.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.94%

-3.19%

+2.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.85%

-6.15%

-11.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.02%

3.59%

+1.43%

Volatility

X7PS.L vs. EQQU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco STOXX Europe 600 Optimised Banks UCITS ETF (X7PS.L) is 5.45%, while Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQU.L) has a volatility of 5.79%. This indicates that X7PS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EQQU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


X7PS.LEQQU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.45%

5.79%

-0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.89%

13.54%

+5.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.39%

17.69%

+4.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.71%

20.76%

+2.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.86%

20.36%

+4.50%

X7PS.L vs. EQQU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both X7PS.L and EQQU.L have an expense ratio of 0.30%.


Dividends

X7PS.L vs. EQQU.L - Dividend Comparison

X7PS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EQQU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EQQU.L
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF
0.23%0.29%0.38%0.39%0.56%0.26%0.39%0.55%0.65%0.64%0.82%0.74%
X7PS.L
Invesco STOXX Europe 600 Optimised Banks UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


X7PS.L and EQQU.L have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.30% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

X7PS.L and EQQU.L have the same expense ratio: 0.30% per year.

X7PS.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while EQQU.L is Nasdaq-100. X7PS.L tracks Invesco STOXX Europe 600 Optimised Banks UCITS ETF, while EQQU.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for X7PS.L and EQQU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer