X7PP.L vs. XLKQ.L
X7PP.L (Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF) and XLKQ.L (Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - X7PP.L is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while XLKQ.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, X7PP.L returned 14.91%/yr vs 27.22%/yr for XLKQ.L. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. X7PP.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLKQ.L.
Performance
X7PP.L vs. XLKQ.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, X7PP.L achieves a 5.21% return, which is significantly lower than XLKQ.L's 23.81% return. Over the past 10 years, X7PP.L has underperformed XLKQ.L with an annualized return of 14.91%, while XLKQ.L has yielded a comparatively higher 27.22% annualized return.
X7PP.L
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 6.36%
- YTD
- 5.21%
- 6M
- 11.61%
- 1Y
- 43.21%
- 3Y*
- 42.86%
- 5Y*
- 27.44%
- 10Y*
- 14.91%
XLKQ.L
- 1D
- -2.23%
- 1M
- 14.41%
- YTD
- 23.81%
- 6M
- 22.31%
- 1Y
- 54.52%
- 3Y*
- 33.18%
- 5Y*
- 26.60%
- 10Y*
- 27.22%
X7PP.L vs. XLKQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
X7PP.L Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF | 5.21% | 87.77% | 27.07% | 23.27% | 6.04% | 29.16% | -18.50% | 8.33% | -25.45% | 15.44% |
XLKQ.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc | 23.81% | 15.76% | 44.03% | 51.84% | -20.58% | 36.28% | 37.93% | 44.63% | 0.92% | 23.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between X7PP.L and XLKQ.L is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2014 | 0.34 |
The correlation between X7PP.L and XLKQ.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (3 years) to 0.39 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
X7PP.L vs. XLKQ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
X7PP.L
XLKQ.L
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
X7PP.L
XLKQ.L
Basic Materials
X7PP.L
-
XLKQ.L
-
Communication Services
X7PP.L
-
XLKQ.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
X7PP.L
-
XLKQ.L
-
Consumer Defensive
X7PP.L
-
XLKQ.L
-
Energy
X7PP.L
-
XLKQ.L
-
Healthcare
X7PP.L
-
XLKQ.L
-
Industrials
X7PP.L
-
XLKQ.L
Real Estate
X7PP.L
-
XLKQ.L
-
Technology
X7PP.L
-
XLKQ.L
Utilities
X7PP.L
-
XLKQ.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
X7PP.L vs. XLKQ.L — Risk / Return Rank
X7PP.L
XLKQ.L
X7PP.L vs. XLKQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| X7PP.L | XLKQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.46 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.70 | 3.24 | -0.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.03 | 8.42 | +0.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| X7PP.L | XLKQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98 | 2.83 | -0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.17 | 1.21 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 1.33 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 1.33 | -0.91 |
Drawdowns
X7PP.L vs. XLKQ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum X7PP.L drawdown since its inception was -56.28%, which is greater than XLKQ.L's maximum drawdown of -28.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for X7PP.L and XLKQ.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| X7PP.L | XLKQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.28% | -28.74% | -27.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.94% | -16.76% | +0.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.17% | -28.74% | +10.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.79% | -28.74% | -2.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.28% | -28.74% | -27.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.64% | -2.84% | +1.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.39% | -5.04% | -10.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.77% | 6.45% | -1.68% |
Volatility
X7PP.L vs. XLKQ.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L) is 6.19%, while Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) has a volatility of 6.83%. This indicates that X7PP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLKQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| X7PP.L | XLKQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.19% | 6.83% | -0.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.80% | 14.29% | +3.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.78% | 19.18% | +2.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.48% | 22.04% | +1.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.63% | 21.65% | +2.98% |
X7PP.L vs. XLKQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
X7PP.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XLKQ.L's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
X7PP.L vs. XLKQ.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither X7PP.L nor XLKQ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
X7PP.L and XLKQ.L have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLKQ.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLKQ.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for X7PP.L.
X7PP.L is categorized as Financials Equities, while XLKQ.L is Technology Equities. X7PP.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while XLKQ.L tracks S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for X7PP.L and 0.14% for XLKQ.L.
Find the right allocation for X7PP.L and XLKQ.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer