X7PP.L vs. XLEP.L
X7PP.L (Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF) and XLEP.L (Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - X7PP.L is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while XLEP.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, X7PP.L returned 14.91%/yr vs 10.15%/yr for XLEP.L. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. X7PP.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLEP.L.
Performance
X7PP.L vs. XLEP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, X7PP.L achieves a 5.21% return, which is significantly lower than XLEP.L's 31.41% return. Over the past 10 years, X7PP.L has outperformed XLEP.L with an annualized return of 14.91%, while XLEP.L has yielded a comparatively lower 10.15% annualized return.
X7PP.L
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 6.36%
- YTD
- 5.21%
- 6M
- 11.61%
- 1Y
- 43.21%
- 3Y*
- 42.86%
- 5Y*
- 27.44%
- 10Y*
- 14.91%
XLEP.L
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- YTD
- 31.41%
- 6M
- 28.36%
- 1Y
- 47.38%
- 3Y*
- 14.05%
- 5Y*
- 21.30%
- 10Y*
- 10.15%
X7PP.L vs. XLEP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
X7PP.L Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF | 5.21% | 87.77% | 27.07% | 23.27% | 6.04% | 29.16% | -18.50% | 8.33% | -25.45% | 15.44% |
XLEP.L Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF | 31.41% | 1.41% | 4.85% | -5.07% | 81.43% | 53.83% | -35.01% | 5.84% | -13.66% | -9.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between X7PP.L and XLEP.L is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2014 | 0.37 |
The correlation between X7PP.L and XLEP.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.25 (1 year) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
X7PP.L vs. XLEP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
X7PP.L
XLEP.L
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
X7PP.L
XLEP.L
-
Basic Materials
X7PP.L
-
XLEP.L
-
Communication Services
X7PP.L
-
XLEP.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
X7PP.L
-
XLEP.L
-
Consumer Defensive
X7PP.L
-
XLEP.L
-
Energy
X7PP.L
-
XLEP.L
Healthcare
X7PP.L
-
XLEP.L
-
Industrials
X7PP.L
-
XLEP.L
-
Real Estate
X7PP.L
-
XLEP.L
-
Technology
X7PP.L
-
XLEP.L
-
Utilities
X7PP.L
-
XLEP.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
X7PP.L vs. XLEP.L — Risk / Return Rank
X7PP.L
XLEP.L
X7PP.L vs. XLEP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L) and Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF (XLEP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| X7PP.L | XLEP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.35 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.70 | 2.92 | -0.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.03 | 9.27 | -0.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| X7PP.L | XLEP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98 | 2.02 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.17 | 0.81 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 0.36 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.25 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
X7PP.L vs. XLEP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum X7PP.L drawdown since its inception was -56.28%, smaller than the maximum XLEP.L drawdown of -63.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for X7PP.L and XLEP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| X7PP.L | XLEP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.28% | -63.35% | +7.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.94% | -16.17% | +0.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.17% | -24.06% | +5.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.79% | -24.16% | -6.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.28% | -63.35% | +7.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.64% | -8.08% | +6.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.39% | -16.96% | +1.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.77% | 5.10% | -0.33% |
Volatility
X7PP.L vs. XLEP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L) is 6.19%, while Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF (XLEP.L) has a volatility of 8.92%. This indicates that X7PP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLEP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| X7PP.L | XLEP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.19% | 8.92% | -2.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.80% | 19.87% | -2.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.78% | 23.44% | -1.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.48% | 26.28% | -2.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.63% | 28.14% | -3.51% |
X7PP.L vs. XLEP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
X7PP.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XLEP.L's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
X7PP.L vs. XLEP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither X7PP.L nor XLEP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
X7PP.L and XLEP.L have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLEP.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLEP.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for X7PP.L.
X7PP.L is categorized as Financials Equities, while XLEP.L is Energy Equities. X7PP.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while XLEP.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for X7PP.L and 0.14% for XLEP.L.
Find the right allocation for X7PP.L and XLEP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer