X7PP.L vs. X7PS.L
X7PP.L (Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF) and X7PS.L (Invesco STOXX Europe 600 Optimised Banks UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - X7PP.L is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while X7PS.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the STOXX Europe 600 Optimised Banks Index (EUR). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, X7PP.L returned 16.39%/yr vs 16.34%/yr for X7PS.L. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.20% expense ratio.
Performance
X7PP.L vs. X7PS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
X7PP.L is traded in GBp, while X7PS.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the X7PS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with X7PP.L having a 13.46% return and X7PS.L slightly higher at 13.65%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with X7PP.L having a 16.39% annualized return and X7PS.L not far behind at 16.34%.
X7PP.L
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 10.68%
- YTD
- 13.46%
- 1Y
- 47.92%
- 3Y*
- 43.16%
- 5Y*
- 31.58%
- 10Y*
- 16.39%
X7PS.L
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- -0.04%
- 6M
- 10.58%
- YTD
- 13.65%
- 1Y
- 47.90%
- 3Y*
- 43.02%
- 5Y*
- 31.54%
- 10Y*
- 16.34%
X7PP.L vs. X7PS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
X7PP.L Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF | 13.46% | 87.77% | 27.07% | 23.27% | 6.04% | 29.16% | -18.50% | 8.33% | -26.15% | 16.53% |
X7PS.L Invesco STOXX Europe 600 Optimised Banks UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | 13.65% | 87.84% | 27.12% | 23.19% | 5.63% | 30.02% | -18.45% | 7.52% | -25.50% | 16.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between X7PP.L and X7PS.L is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2014 | 0.97 |
The correlation between X7PP.L and X7PS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
X7PP.L vs. X7PS.L — Risk / Return Rank
X7PP.L
X7PS.L
X7PP.L vs. X7PS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L) and Invesco STOXX Europe 600 Optimised Banks UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (X7PS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| X7PP.L | X7PS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.35 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.99 | 2.97 | +0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.97 | 9.92 | +0.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
X7PP.L vs. X7PS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum X7PP.L drawdown since its inception was -56.28%, roughly equal to the maximum X7PS.L drawdown of -56.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for X7PP.L and X7PS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| X7PP.L | X7PS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.28% | -56.34% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.94% | -16.07% | +0.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.17% | -18.22% | +0.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.79% | -30.73% | -0.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.28% | -56.34% | +0.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.60% | -2.58% | -0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.27% | -14.49% | -0.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.79% | 4.81% | -0.02% |
Volatility
X7PP.L vs. X7PS.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L) and Invesco STOXX Europe 600 Optimised Banks UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (X7PS.L) have volatilities of 5.48% and 5.51%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| X7PP.L | X7PS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.48% | 5.51% | -0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.72% | 18.93% | -0.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.00% | 22.34% | -0.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.49% | 23.77% | -0.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.22% | 24.61% | -0.39% |
X7PP.L vs. X7PS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both X7PP.L and X7PS.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
X7PP.L vs. X7PS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither X7PP.L nor X7PS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, X7PP.L and X7PS.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
X7PP.L and X7PS.L have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.
X7PP.L is categorized as Financials Equities, while X7PS.L is Europe Equities. X7PP.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while X7PS.L tracks STOXX Europe 600 Optimised Banks Index (EUR).
Find the right allocation for X7PP.L and X7PS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer