X7PP.L vs. WDEE.L
X7PP.L (Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF) and WDEE.L (Invesco S&P World Energy Targeted & Screened UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - X7PP.L is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while WDEE.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P World Energy Targeted & Screened Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, X7PP.L returned 42.86%/yr vs 15.96%/yr for WDEE.L. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. X7PP.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for WDEE.L.
Performance
X7PP.L vs. WDEE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
X7PP.L is traded in GBp, while WDEE.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the WDEE.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, X7PP.L achieves a 5.21% return, which is significantly lower than WDEE.L's 30.50% return.
X7PP.L
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 6.36%
- YTD
- 5.21%
- 6M
- 11.61%
- 1Y
- 43.21%
- 3Y*
- 42.86%
- 5Y*
- 27.44%
- 10Y*
- 14.91%
WDEE.L
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- -1.16%
- YTD
- 30.50%
- 6M
- 26.32%
- 1Y
- 40.90%
- 3Y*
- 15.96%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
X7PP.L vs. WDEE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
X7PP.L Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF | 5.21% | 87.77% | 27.07% | 12.94% |
WDEE.L Invesco S&P World Energy Targeted & Screened UCITS ETF Acc | 30.50% | 1.24% | 5.84% | 4.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between X7PP.L and WDEE.L is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2023 | 0.20 |
The correlation between X7PP.L and WDEE.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
X7PP.L vs. WDEE.L — Risk / Return Rank
X7PP.L
WDEE.L
X7PP.L vs. WDEE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L) and Invesco S&P World Energy Targeted & Screened UCITS ETF Acc (WDEE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| X7PP.L | WDEE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.36 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.70 | 3.43 | -0.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.03 | 10.75 | -1.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| X7PP.L | WDEE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98 | 2.09 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.17 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.67 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
X7PP.L vs. WDEE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum X7PP.L drawdown since its inception was -56.28%, which is greater than WDEE.L's maximum drawdown of -21.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for X7PP.L and WDEE.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| X7PP.L | WDEE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.28% | -21.91% | -34.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.94% | -11.86% | -4.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.17% | -21.91% | +3.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.79% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.28% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.64% | -5.47% | +3.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.39% | -7.26% | -8.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.77% | 3.79% | +0.98% |
Volatility
X7PP.L vs. WDEE.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L) is 6.19%, while Invesco S&P World Energy Targeted & Screened UCITS ETF Acc (WDEE.L) has a volatility of 7.32%. This indicates that X7PP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WDEE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| X7PP.L | WDEE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.19% | 7.32% | -1.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.80% | 15.99% | +1.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.78% | 19.54% | +2.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.48% | 19.34% | +4.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.63% | 19.34% | +5.29% |
X7PP.L vs. WDEE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
X7PP.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than WDEE.L's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
X7PP.L vs. WDEE.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither X7PP.L nor WDEE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
X7PP.L and WDEE.L have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WDEE.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WDEE.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for X7PP.L.
X7PP.L is categorized as Financials Equities, while WDEE.L is Energy Equities. X7PP.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while WDEE.L tracks S&P World Energy Targeted & Screened Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for X7PP.L and 0.18% for WDEE.L.
Find the right allocation for X7PP.L and WDEE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer