X7PP.L vs. SRIW.L
X7PP.L (Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF) and SRIW.L (UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) are both exchange-traded funds - X7PP.L is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while SRIW.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, X7PP.L returned 27.44%/yr vs 11.01%/yr for SRIW.L. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. X7PP.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for SRIW.L.
Performance
X7PP.L vs. SRIW.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, X7PP.L achieves a 5.21% return, which is significantly lower than SRIW.L's 9.21% return.
X7PP.L
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 6.36%
- YTD
- 5.21%
- 6M
- 11.61%
- 1Y
- 43.21%
- 3Y*
- 42.86%
- 5Y*
- 27.44%
- 10Y*
- 14.91%
SRIW.L
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 6.85%
- YTD
- 9.21%
- 6M
- 9.45%
- 1Y
- 21.14%
- 3Y*
- 14.81%
- 5Y*
- 11.01%
- 10Y*
- —
X7PP.L vs. SRIW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
X7PP.L Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF | 5.21% | 87.77% | 27.07% | 23.27% | 6.04% | 29.16% | 15.10% |
SRIW.L UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 9.21% | 6.01% | 19.08% | 21.28% | -15.04% | 26.40% | 12.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between X7PP.L and SRIW.L is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2020 | 0.37 |
The correlation between X7PP.L and SRIW.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (all time) to 0.47 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
X7PP.L vs. SRIW.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
X7PP.L
SRIW.L
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
X7PP.L
SRIW.L
Basic Materials
X7PP.L
-
SRIW.L
Communication Services
X7PP.L
-
SRIW.L
Consumer Cyclical
X7PP.L
-
SRIW.L
Consumer Defensive
X7PP.L
-
SRIW.L
Energy
X7PP.L
-
SRIW.L
Healthcare
X7PP.L
-
SRIW.L
Industrials
X7PP.L
-
SRIW.L
Real Estate
X7PP.L
-
SRIW.L
Technology
X7PP.L
-
SRIW.L
Utilities
X7PP.L
-
SRIW.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
X7PP.L vs. SRIW.L — Risk / Return Rank
X7PP.L
SRIW.L
X7PP.L vs. SRIW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L) and UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SRIW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| X7PP.L | SRIW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.35 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.70 | 2.41 | +0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.03 | 8.30 | +0.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| X7PP.L | SRIW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98 | 1.94 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.17 | 0.90 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 1.01 | -0.59 |
Drawdowns
X7PP.L vs. SRIW.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum X7PP.L drawdown since its inception was -56.28%, which is greater than SRIW.L's maximum drawdown of -21.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for X7PP.L and SRIW.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| X7PP.L | SRIW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.28% | -21.55% | -34.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.94% | -9.66% | -6.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.17% | -20.07% | +1.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.79% | -21.55% | -9.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.28% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.64% | 0.00% | -1.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.39% | -4.93% | -10.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.77% | 2.71% | +2.06% |
Volatility
X7PP.L vs. SRIW.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L) has a higher volatility of 6.19% compared to UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SRIW.L) at 3.27%. This indicates that X7PP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SRIW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| X7PP.L | SRIW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.19% | 3.27% | +2.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.80% | 8.88% | +8.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.78% | 12.02% | +9.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.48% | 16.64% | +6.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.63% | 16.31% | +8.32% |
X7PP.L vs. SRIW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
X7PP.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than SRIW.L's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
X7PP.L vs. SRIW.L - Dividend Comparison
X7PP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SRIW.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRIW.L UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 1.01% | 1.28% | 1.25% | 1.26% | 1.47% | 1.10% | 0.22% |
X7PP.L Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
X7PP.L and SRIW.L have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, X7PP.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
X7PP.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for SRIW.L.
X7PP.L is categorized as Financials Equities, while SRIW.L is Global Equities. X7PP.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while SRIW.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for X7PP.L and 0.22% for SRIW.L.
Find the right allocation for X7PP.L and SRIW.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer