X7PP.L vs. LYP6.DE
X7PP.L (Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF) and LYP6.DE (Amundi Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - X7PP.L is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while LYP6.DE is a Europe Equities fund tracking the STOXX® Europe 600. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, X7PP.L returned 16.26%/yr vs 10.94%/yr for LYP6.DE. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. X7PP.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for LYP6.DE.
Performance
X7PP.L vs. LYP6.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
X7PP.L is traded in GBp, while LYP6.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the LYP6.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with X7PP.L having a 7.48% return and LYP6.DE slightly higher at 7.81%. Over the past 10 years, X7PP.L has outperformed LYP6.DE with an annualized return of 16.26%, while LYP6.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 10.94% annualized return.
X7PP.L
- 1D
- 4.06%
- 1M
- 5.15%
- YTD
- 7.48%
- 6M
- 11.87%
- 1Y
- 46.89%
- 3Y*
- 43.37%
- 5Y*
- 28.29%
- 10Y*
- 16.26%
LYP6.DE
- 1D
- 1.88%
- 1M
- 2.03%
- YTD
- 7.81%
- 6M
- 9.68%
- 1Y
- 21.17%
- 3Y*
- 14.55%
- 5Y*
- 9.93%
- 10Y*
- 10.94%
X7PP.L vs. LYP6.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
X7PP.L Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF | 7.48% | 87.77% | 27.07% | 23.27% | 6.04% | 29.16% | -18.50% | 8.33% | -26.15% | 16.53% |
LYP6.DE Amundi Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) UCITS ETF Acc | 7.81% | 27.11% | 3.53% | 13.65% | -5.50% | 16.00% | 3.83% | 21.90% | -10.03% | 16.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between X7PP.L and LYP6.DE is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2014 | 0.66 |
The correlation between X7PP.L and LYP6.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
X7PP.L vs. LYP6.DE — Risk / Return Rank
X7PP.L
LYP6.DE
X7PP.L vs. LYP6.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L) and Amundi Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) UCITS ETF Acc (LYP6.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| X7PP.L | LYP6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.29 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.79 | 1.93 | +0.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.30 | 7.10 | +2.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
X7PP.L vs. LYP6.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum X7PP.L drawdown since its inception was -56.28%, which is greater than LYP6.DE's maximum drawdown of -27.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for X7PP.L and LYP6.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| X7PP.L | LYP6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.28% | -27.65% | -28.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.94% | -10.41% | -5.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.17% | -13.78% | -4.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.79% | -16.91% | -13.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.28% | -27.65% | -28.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.17% | +0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.39% | -4.12% | -11.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.79% | 2.84% | +1.95% |
Volatility
X7PP.L vs. LYP6.DE - Volatility Comparison
Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L) has a higher volatility of 6.12% compared to Amundi Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) UCITS ETF Acc (LYP6.DE) at 4.02%. This indicates that X7PP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYP6.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| X7PP.L | LYP6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.12% | 4.02% | +2.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.15% | 10.72% | +7.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.12% | 12.65% | +9.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.54% | 14.29% | +9.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.57% | 15.20% | +9.37% |
X7PP.L vs. LYP6.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
X7PP.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than LYP6.DE's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
X7PP.L vs. LYP6.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither X7PP.L nor LYP6.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
X7PP.L and LYP6.DE have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LYP6.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LYP6.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for X7PP.L.
X7PP.L is categorized as Financials Equities, while LYP6.DE is Europe Equities. X7PP.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while LYP6.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for X7PP.L and 0.07% for LYP6.DE.
Find the right allocation for X7PP.L and LYP6.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer