X7PP.L vs. IUFS.L
X7PP.L (Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF) and IUFS.L (iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both Financials Equities funds - X7PP.L tracks the MSCI World/Financials NR USD while IUFS.L tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Financials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, X7PP.L returned 17.57%/yr vs 13.80%/yr for IUFS.L. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. X7PP.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IUFS.L.
Performance
X7PP.L vs. IUFS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
X7PP.L is traded in GBp, while IUFS.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IUFS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, X7PP.L achieves a 13.13% return, which is significantly higher than IUFS.L's 1.14% return. Over the past 10 years, X7PP.L has outperformed IUFS.L with an annualized return of 17.57%, while IUFS.L has yielded a comparatively lower 13.80% annualized return.
X7PP.L
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- 6.93%
- YTD
- 13.13%
- 6M
- 13.64%
- 1Y
- 53.47%
- 3Y*
- 46.70%
- 5Y*
- 29.87%
- 10Y*
- 17.57%
IUFS.L
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 7.02%
- YTD
- 1.14%
- 6M
- 0.90%
- 1Y
- 10.68%
- 3Y*
- 18.48%
- 5Y*
- 10.70%
- 10Y*
- 13.80%
X7PP.L vs. IUFS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
X7PP.L Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF | 13.13% | 87.77% | 27.07% | 23.27% | 6.04% | 29.16% | -18.50% | 8.33% | -26.15% | 16.53% |
IUFS.L iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc | 1.14% | 6.85% | 32.50% | 6.52% | -0.48% | 37.60% | -6.12% | 26.07% | -9.24% | 12.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between X7PP.L and IUFS.L is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2015 | 0.59 |
The correlation between X7PP.L and IUFS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (3 years) to 0.59 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
X7PP.L vs. IUFS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
X7PP.L
IUFS.L
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
X7PP.L
IUFS.L
Basic Materials
X7PP.L
-
IUFS.L
-
Communication Services
X7PP.L
-
IUFS.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
X7PP.L
-
IUFS.L
-
Consumer Defensive
X7PP.L
-
IUFS.L
-
Energy
X7PP.L
-
IUFS.L
-
Healthcare
X7PP.L
-
IUFS.L
-
Industrials
X7PP.L
-
IUFS.L
Real Estate
X7PP.L
-
IUFS.L
-
Technology
X7PP.L
-
IUFS.L
Utilities
X7PP.L
-
IUFS.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
X7PP.L vs. IUFS.L — Risk / Return Rank
X7PP.L
IUFS.L
X7PP.L vs. IUFS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L) and iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUFS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| X7PP.L | IUFS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.13 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.34 | 0.80 | +2.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.15 | 1.90 | +9.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
X7PP.L vs. IUFS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum X7PP.L drawdown since its inception was -56.28%, which is greater than IUFS.L's maximum drawdown of -35.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for X7PP.L and IUFS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| X7PP.L | IUFS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.28% | -35.97% | -20.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.94% | -13.25% | -2.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.17% | -18.90% | +0.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.79% | -18.90% | -11.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.28% | -35.97% | -20.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.73% | -0.95% | -0.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.34% | -6.08% | -9.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.78% | 5.59% | -0.81% |
Volatility
X7PP.L vs. IUFS.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L) has a higher volatility of 6.30% compared to iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUFS.L) at 5.35%. This indicates that X7PP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUFS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| X7PP.L | IUFS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.30% | 5.35% | +0.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.31% | 11.97% | +6.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.89% | 15.16% | +6.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.55% | 18.58% | +4.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.30% | 20.92% | +3.38% |
X7PP.L vs. IUFS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
X7PP.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than IUFS.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
X7PP.L vs. IUFS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither X7PP.L nor IUFS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
X7PP.L and IUFS.L have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IUFS.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUFS.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for X7PP.L.
X7PP.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while IUFS.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Financials Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for X7PP.L and 0.15% for IUFS.L.
Find the right allocation for X7PP.L and IUFS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer