X7PP.L vs. FNCL.L
X7PP.L (Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF) and FNCL.L (SPDR® MSCI Europe Financials UCITS ETF) are both Financials Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Financials NR USD, from Invesco and State Street respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, X7PP.L returned 14.91%/yr vs 13.32%/yr for FNCL.L. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. X7PP.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for FNCL.L.
Performance
X7PP.L vs. FNCL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
X7PP.L is traded in GBp, while FNCL.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the FNCL.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, X7PP.L achieves a 5.21% return, which is significantly higher than FNCL.L's 2.87% return. Over the past 10 years, X7PP.L has outperformed FNCL.L with an annualized return of 14.91%, while FNCL.L has yielded a comparatively lower 13.32% annualized return.
X7PP.L
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 6.36%
- YTD
- 5.21%
- 6M
- 11.61%
- 1Y
- 43.21%
- 3Y*
- 42.86%
- 5Y*
- 27.44%
- 10Y*
- 14.91%
FNCL.L
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- 3.64%
- YTD
- 2.87%
- 6M
- 8.90%
- 1Y
- 25.66%
- 3Y*
- 28.95%
- 5Y*
- 19.54%
- 10Y*
- 13.32%
X7PP.L vs. FNCL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
X7PP.L Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF | 5.21% | 87.77% | 27.07% | 23.27% | 6.04% | 29.16% | -18.50% | 8.33% | -25.45% | 15.44% |
FNCL.L SPDR® MSCI Europe Financials UCITS ETF | 2.87% | 54.90% | 20.20% | 18.78% | 3.18% | 20.99% | -10.63% | 15.29% | -18.17% | 17.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between X7PP.L and FNCL.L is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2014 | 0.92 |
The correlation between X7PP.L and FNCL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
X7PP.L vs. FNCL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
X7PP.L
FNCL.L
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
X7PP.L
FNCL.L
Basic Materials
X7PP.L
-
FNCL.L
-
Communication Services
X7PP.L
-
FNCL.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
X7PP.L
-
FNCL.L
-
Consumer Defensive
X7PP.L
-
FNCL.L
-
Energy
X7PP.L
-
FNCL.L
-
Healthcare
X7PP.L
-
FNCL.L
-
Industrials
X7PP.L
-
FNCL.L
Real Estate
X7PP.L
-
FNCL.L
-
Technology
X7PP.L
-
FNCL.L
Utilities
X7PP.L
-
FNCL.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
X7PP.L vs. FNCL.L — Risk / Return Rank
X7PP.L
FNCL.L
X7PP.L vs. FNCL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L) and SPDR® MSCI Europe Financials UCITS ETF (FNCL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| X7PP.L | FNCL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.25 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.70 | 2.13 | +0.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.03 | 7.39 | +1.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| X7PP.L | FNCL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98 | 1.47 | +0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.17 | 1.04 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 0.66 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.52 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
X7PP.L vs. FNCL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum X7PP.L drawdown since its inception was -56.28%, which is greater than FNCL.L's maximum drawdown of -42.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for X7PP.L and FNCL.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| X7PP.L | FNCL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.28% | -42.41% | -13.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.94% | -11.98% | -3.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.17% | -14.85% | -3.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.79% | -23.57% | -7.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.28% | -42.41% | -13.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.64% | -1.67% | +0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.39% | -9.13% | -6.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.77% | 3.46% | +1.31% |
Volatility
X7PP.L vs. FNCL.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L) has a higher volatility of 6.19% compared to SPDR® MSCI Europe Financials UCITS ETF (FNCL.L) at 5.54%. This indicates that X7PP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNCL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| X7PP.L | FNCL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.19% | 5.54% | +0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.80% | 14.46% | +3.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.78% | 17.42% | +4.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.48% | 18.70% | +4.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.63% | 20.22% | +4.41% |
X7PP.L vs. FNCL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
X7PP.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than FNCL.L's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
X7PP.L vs. FNCL.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither X7PP.L nor FNCL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, X7PP.L and FNCL.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, FNCL.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FNCL.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for X7PP.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI World/Financials NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for X7PP.L and 0.18% for FNCL.L.
Find the right allocation for X7PP.L and FNCL.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer