PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
X7PP.L vs. FNCL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

X7PP.L vs. FNCL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L) and SPDR® MSCI Europe Financials UCITS ETF (FNCL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

X7PP.L is traded in GBp, while FNCL.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the FNCL.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, X7PP.L achieves a 5.21% return, which is significantly higher than FNCL.L's 2.87% return. Over the past 10 years, X7PP.L has outperformed FNCL.L with an annualized return of 14.91%, while FNCL.L has yielded a comparatively lower 13.32% annualized return.


X7PP.L

1D
0.44%
1M
6.36%
YTD
5.21%
6M
11.61%
1Y
43.21%
3Y*
42.86%
5Y*
27.44%
10Y*
14.91%

FNCL.L

1D
0.75%
1M
3.64%
YTD
2.87%
6M
8.90%
1Y
25.66%
3Y*
28.95%
5Y*
19.54%
10Y*
13.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

X7PP.L vs. FNCL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
X7PP.L
Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF
5.21%87.77%27.07%23.27%6.04%29.16%-18.50%8.33%-25.45%15.44%
FNCL.L
SPDR® MSCI Europe Financials UCITS ETF
2.87%54.90%20.20%18.78%3.18%20.99%-10.63%15.29%-18.17%17.53%

Correlation

The correlation between X7PP.L and FNCL.L is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2014

0.92

The correlation between X7PP.L and FNCL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

X7PP.L vs. FNCL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
X7PP.L
FNCL.L

Financial Services

100.0%
98.1%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

0.7%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

1.2%

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

X7PP.L
100.0%
FNCL.L
98.1%

Basic Materials

X7PP.L

-

FNCL.L

-

Communication Services

X7PP.L

-

FNCL.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

X7PP.L

-

FNCL.L

-

Consumer Defensive

X7PP.L

-

FNCL.L

-

Energy

X7PP.L

-

FNCL.L

-

Healthcare

X7PP.L

-

FNCL.L

-

Industrials

X7PP.L

-

FNCL.L
0.7%

Real Estate

X7PP.L

-

FNCL.L

-

Technology

X7PP.L

-

FNCL.L
1.2%

Utilities

X7PP.L

-

FNCL.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

X7PP.L vs. FNCL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

X7PP.L
X7PP.L Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
X7PP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
X7PP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
X7PP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
X7PP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
X7PP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

FNCL.L
FNCL.L Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
FNCL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNCL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNCL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
FNCL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNCL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

X7PP.L vs. FNCL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L) and SPDR® MSCI Europe Financials UCITS ETF (FNCL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


X7PP.LFNCL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.25

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

2.13

+0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.03

7.39

+1.64

X7PP.L vs. FNCL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current X7PP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is higher than the FNCL.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of X7PP.L and FNCL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


X7PP.LFNCL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98

1.47

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.17

1.04

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.66

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.52

-0.10

Drawdowns

X7PP.L vs. FNCL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum X7PP.L drawdown since its inception was -56.28%, which is greater than FNCL.L's maximum drawdown of -42.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for X7PP.L and FNCL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


X7PP.LFNCL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.28%

-42.41%

-13.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.94%

-11.98%

-3.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.17%

-14.85%

-3.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.79%

-23.57%

-7.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.28%

-42.41%

-13.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.64%

-1.67%

+0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.39%

-9.13%

-6.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.77%

3.46%

+1.31%

Volatility

X7PP.L vs. FNCL.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L) has a higher volatility of 6.19% compared to SPDR® MSCI Europe Financials UCITS ETF (FNCL.L) at 5.54%. This indicates that X7PP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNCL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


X7PP.LFNCL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.19%

5.54%

+0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.80%

14.46%

+3.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.78%

17.42%

+4.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.48%

18.70%

+4.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.63%

20.22%

+4.41%

X7PP.L vs. FNCL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

X7PP.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than FNCL.L's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

X7PP.L vs. FNCL.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither X7PP.L nor FNCL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, X7PP.L and FNCL.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, FNCL.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FNCL.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for X7PP.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Financials NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for X7PP.L and 0.18% for FNCL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for X7PP.L and FNCL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer