PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
X7PP.L vs. EQQQ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

X7PP.L vs. EQQQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, X7PP.L achieves a 5.21% return, which is significantly lower than EQQQ.L's 19.86% return. Over the past 10 years, X7PP.L has underperformed EQQQ.L with an annualized return of 14.91%, while EQQQ.L has yielded a comparatively higher 22.47% annualized return.


X7PP.L

1D
0.44%
1M
6.36%
YTD
5.21%
6M
11.61%
1Y
43.21%
3Y*
42.86%
5Y*
27.44%
10Y*
14.91%

EQQQ.L

1D
-0.63%
1M
9.63%
YTD
19.86%
6M
18.38%
1Y
41.62%
3Y*
24.65%
5Y*
18.87%
10Y*
22.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

X7PP.L vs. EQQQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
X7PP.L
Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF
5.21%87.77%27.07%23.27%6.04%29.16%-18.50%8.33%-25.45%15.44%
EQQQ.L
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF
19.86%11.54%28.55%47.79%-25.54%29.59%43.32%33.69%4.64%20.12%

Correlation

The correlation between X7PP.L and EQQQ.L is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2014

0.37

The correlation between X7PP.L and EQQQ.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (3 years) to 0.41 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

X7PP.L vs. EQQQ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
X7PP.L
EQQQ.L

Financial Services

100.0%
0.2%

Basic Materials

-

1.0%

Communication Services

-

14.5%

Consumer Cyclical

-

11.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

6.6%

Energy

-

0.5%

Healthcare

-

3.7%

Industrials

-

2.8%

Real Estate

-

0.0%

Technology

-

57.9%

Utilities

-

1.2%

Financial Services

X7PP.L
100.0%
EQQQ.L
0.2%

Basic Materials

X7PP.L

-

EQQQ.L
1.0%

Communication Services

X7PP.L

-

EQQQ.L
14.5%

Consumer Cyclical

X7PP.L

-

EQQQ.L
11.6%

Consumer Defensive

X7PP.L

-

EQQQ.L
6.6%

Energy

X7PP.L

-

EQQQ.L
0.5%

Healthcare

X7PP.L

-

EQQQ.L
3.7%

Industrials

X7PP.L

-

EQQQ.L
2.8%

Real Estate

X7PP.L

-

EQQQ.L
0.0%

Technology

X7PP.L

-

EQQQ.L
57.9%

Utilities

X7PP.L

-

EQQQ.L
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

X7PP.L vs. EQQQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

X7PP.L
X7PP.L Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
X7PP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
X7PP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
X7PP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
X7PP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
X7PP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

EQQQ.L
EQQQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
EQQQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

X7PP.L vs. EQQQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


X7PP.LEQQQ.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.50

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

3.78

-1.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.03

11.13

-2.10

X7PP.L vs. EQQQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current X7PP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the EQQQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of X7PP.L and EQQQ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


X7PP.LEQQQ.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98

2.82

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.17

0.99

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

1.16

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.92

-0.50

Drawdowns

X7PP.L vs. EQQQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum X7PP.L drawdown since its inception was -56.28%, which is greater than EQQQ.L's maximum drawdown of -33.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for X7PP.L and EQQQ.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


X7PP.LEQQQ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.28%

-33.75%

-22.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.94%

-10.97%

-4.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.17%

-24.09%

+5.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.79%

-27.76%

-3.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.28%

-27.76%

-28.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.64%

-0.63%

-1.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.39%

-5.61%

-9.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.77%

3.73%

+1.04%

Volatility

X7PP.L vs. EQQQ.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L) has a higher volatility of 6.19% compared to Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L) at 4.15%. This indicates that X7PP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQQQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


X7PP.LEQQQ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.19%

4.15%

+2.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.80%

10.33%

+7.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.78%

14.70%

+7.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.48%

19.14%

+4.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.63%

19.35%

+5.28%

X7PP.L vs. EQQQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

X7PP.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than EQQQ.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

X7PP.L vs. EQQQ.L - Dividend Comparison

X7PP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EQQQ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EQQQ.L
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF
0.23%0.29%0.38%0.39%0.56%0.25%0.41%0.56%0.63%0.67%0.77%0.72%
X7PP.L
Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


X7PP.L and EQQQ.L have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, X7PP.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

X7PP.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EQQQ.L.

X7PP.L is categorized as Financials Equities, while EQQQ.L is Nasdaq-100. X7PP.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while EQQQ.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for X7PP.L and 0.30% for EQQQ.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for X7PP.L and EQQQ.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer