X7PP.L vs. EQQQ.L
X7PP.L (Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF) and EQQQ.L (Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - X7PP.L is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while EQQQ.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, X7PP.L returned 14.91%/yr vs 22.47%/yr for EQQQ.L. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. X7PP.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for EQQQ.L.
Performance
X7PP.L vs. EQQQ.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, X7PP.L achieves a 5.21% return, which is significantly lower than EQQQ.L's 19.86% return. Over the past 10 years, X7PP.L has underperformed EQQQ.L with an annualized return of 14.91%, while EQQQ.L has yielded a comparatively higher 22.47% annualized return.
X7PP.L
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 6.36%
- YTD
- 5.21%
- 6M
- 11.61%
- 1Y
- 43.21%
- 3Y*
- 42.86%
- 5Y*
- 27.44%
- 10Y*
- 14.91%
EQQQ.L
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 9.63%
- YTD
- 19.86%
- 6M
- 18.38%
- 1Y
- 41.62%
- 3Y*
- 24.65%
- 5Y*
- 18.87%
- 10Y*
- 22.47%
X7PP.L vs. EQQQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
X7PP.L Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF | 5.21% | 87.77% | 27.07% | 23.27% | 6.04% | 29.16% | -18.50% | 8.33% | -25.45% | 15.44% |
EQQQ.L Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF | 19.86% | 11.54% | 28.55% | 47.79% | -25.54% | 29.59% | 43.32% | 33.69% | 4.64% | 20.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between X7PP.L and EQQQ.L is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2014 | 0.37 |
The correlation between X7PP.L and EQQQ.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (3 years) to 0.41 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
X7PP.L vs. EQQQ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
X7PP.L
EQQQ.L
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
X7PP.L
EQQQ.L
Basic Materials
X7PP.L
-
EQQQ.L
Communication Services
X7PP.L
-
EQQQ.L
Consumer Cyclical
X7PP.L
-
EQQQ.L
Consumer Defensive
X7PP.L
-
EQQQ.L
Energy
X7PP.L
-
EQQQ.L
Healthcare
X7PP.L
-
EQQQ.L
Industrials
X7PP.L
-
EQQQ.L
Real Estate
X7PP.L
-
EQQQ.L
Technology
X7PP.L
-
EQQQ.L
Utilities
X7PP.L
-
EQQQ.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
X7PP.L vs. EQQQ.L — Risk / Return Rank
X7PP.L
EQQQ.L
X7PP.L vs. EQQQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| X7PP.L | EQQQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.50 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.70 | 3.78 | -1.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.03 | 11.13 | -2.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| X7PP.L | EQQQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98 | 2.82 | -0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.17 | 0.99 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 1.16 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.92 | -0.50 |
Drawdowns
X7PP.L vs. EQQQ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum X7PP.L drawdown since its inception was -56.28%, which is greater than EQQQ.L's maximum drawdown of -33.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for X7PP.L and EQQQ.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| X7PP.L | EQQQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.28% | -33.75% | -22.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.94% | -10.97% | -4.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.17% | -24.09% | +5.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.79% | -27.76% | -3.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.28% | -27.76% | -28.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.64% | -0.63% | -1.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.39% | -5.61% | -9.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.77% | 3.73% | +1.04% |
Volatility
X7PP.L vs. EQQQ.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L) has a higher volatility of 6.19% compared to Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L) at 4.15%. This indicates that X7PP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQQQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| X7PP.L | EQQQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.19% | 4.15% | +2.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.80% | 10.33% | +7.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.78% | 14.70% | +7.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.48% | 19.14% | +4.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.63% | 19.35% | +5.28% |
X7PP.L vs. EQQQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
X7PP.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than EQQQ.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
X7PP.L vs. EQQQ.L - Dividend Comparison
X7PP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EQQQ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQQQ.L Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF | 0.23% | 0.29% | 0.38% | 0.39% | 0.56% | 0.25% | 0.41% | 0.56% | 0.63% | 0.67% | 0.77% | 0.72% |
X7PP.L Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
X7PP.L and EQQQ.L have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, X7PP.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
X7PP.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EQQQ.L.
X7PP.L is categorized as Financials Equities, while EQQQ.L is Nasdaq-100. X7PP.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while EQQQ.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for X7PP.L and 0.30% for EQQQ.L.
Find the right allocation for X7PP.L and EQQQ.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer