PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
X03G.DE vs. XZEB.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

X03G.DE vs. XZEB.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers II Germany Government Bond UCITS ETF (X03G.DE) and Xtrackers II ESG Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF (XZEB.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, X03G.DE achieves a -0.04% return, which is significantly lower than XZEB.DE's 0.20% return.


X03G.DE

1D
0.11%
1M
-0.00%
YTD
-0.04%
6M
-0.24%
1Y
-0.95%
3Y*
0.86%
5Y*
-3.03%
10Y*
-1.28%

XZEB.DE

1D
0.07%
1M
-0.04%
YTD
0.20%
6M
0.18%
1Y
-0.32%
3Y*
1.37%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

X03G.DE vs. XZEB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
X03G.DE
Xtrackers II Germany Government Bond UCITS ETF
-0.04%-1.48%0.14%5.23%-7.70%
XZEB.DE
Xtrackers II ESG Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF
0.20%-0.59%0.01%5.77%-7.62%

Correlation

The correlation between X03G.DE and XZEB.DE is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2022

0.98

The correlation between X03G.DE and XZEB.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

X03G.DE vs. XZEB.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

X03G.DE
X03G.DE Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
X03G.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
X03G.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
X03G.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
X03G.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
X03G.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

XZEB.DE
XZEB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
XZEB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XZEB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
XZEB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
XZEB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
XZEB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

X03G.DE vs. XZEB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II Germany Government Bond UCITS ETF (X03G.DE) and Xtrackers II ESG Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF (XZEB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


X03G.DEXZEB.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

0.97

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.47

-0.24

-0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.99

-0.53

-0.45

X03G.DE vs. XZEB.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current X03G.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.37, which is lower than the XZEB.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of X03G.DE and XZEB.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


X03G.DEXZEB.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.37

-0.17

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.04

-0.11

+0.15

Drawdowns

X03G.DE vs. XZEB.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum X03G.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.87%, which is greater than XZEB.DE's maximum drawdown of -13.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for X03G.DE and XZEB.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


X03G.DEXZEB.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.87%

-13.98%

-9.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.89%

-2.97%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.00%

-4.45%

-0.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.28%

-7.28%

-12.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.77%

-8.40%

+0.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.38%

1.33%

+0.05%

Volatility

X03G.DE vs. XZEB.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers II Germany Government Bond UCITS ETF (X03G.DE) is 1.43%, while Xtrackers II ESG Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF (XZEB.DE) has a volatility of 1.57%. This indicates that X03G.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XZEB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


X03G.DEXZEB.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.43%

1.57%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.89%

3.45%

-0.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.68%

4.14%

-0.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.16%

6.32%

-0.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.15%

6.32%

-1.17%

X03G.DE vs. XZEB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both X03G.DE and XZEB.DE have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

X03G.DE vs. XZEB.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither X03G.DE nor XZEB.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
X03G.DE
Xtrackers II Germany Government Bond UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.33%
XZEB.DE
Xtrackers II ESG Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, X03G.DE and XZEB.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

X03G.DE and XZEB.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

X03G.DE tracks iBoxx® EUR Germany, while XZEB.DE tracks FTSE ESG Select EMU Government Bond.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for X03G.DE and XZEB.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer