PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
X03C.DE vs. EL4S.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

X03C.DE vs. EL4S.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers II Eurozone Government Bond 3-5 UCITS ETF (X03C.DE) and Deka Deutsche Boerse EUROGOV Germany 1-3 UCITS ETF (EL4S.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, X03C.DE achieves a -0.14% return, which is significantly lower than EL4S.DE's 0.11% return. Over the past 10 years, X03C.DE has outperformed EL4S.DE with an annualized return of 0.21%, while EL4S.DE has yielded a comparatively lower -0.20% annualized return.


X03C.DE

1D
0.06%
1M
-0.01%
YTD
-0.14%
6M
-0.06%
1Y
0.67%
3Y*
2.83%
5Y*
-0.28%
10Y*
0.21%

EL4S.DE

1D
0.02%
1M
0.06%
YTD
0.11%
6M
0.17%
1Y
0.70%
3Y*
2.24%
5Y*
0.36%
10Y*
-0.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

X03C.DE vs. EL4S.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
X03C.DE
Xtrackers II Eurozone Government Bond 3-5 UCITS ETF
-0.14%2.45%2.38%5.56%-10.15%-1.30%1.36%2.65%0.06%-0.24%
EL4S.DE
Deka Deutsche Boerse EUROGOV Germany 1-3 UCITS ETF
0.11%1.65%2.75%2.51%-4.56%-0.97%-0.79%-0.83%-0.57%-1.08%

Correlation

The correlation between X03C.DE and EL4S.DE is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2011

0.57

The correlation between X03C.DE and EL4S.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (all time) to 0.85 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

X03C.DE vs. EL4S.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

X03C.DE
X03C.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
X03C.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
X03C.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
X03C.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
X03C.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
X03C.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

EL4S.DE
EL4S.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
EL4S.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EL4S.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
EL4S.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
EL4S.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
EL4S.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

X03C.DE vs. EL4S.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II Eurozone Government Bond 3-5 UCITS ETF (X03C.DE) and Deka Deutsche Boerse EUROGOV Germany 1-3 UCITS ETF (EL4S.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


X03C.DEEL4S.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.10

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.15

0.58

-0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.43

1.87

-1.44

X03C.DE vs. EL4S.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current X03C.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is lower than the EL4S.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of X03C.DE and EL4S.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


X03C.DEEL4S.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

0.54

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.08

0.24

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

-0.18

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

-0.30

+0.73

Drawdowns

X03C.DE vs. EL4S.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum X03C.DE drawdown since its inception was -12.23%, smaller than the maximum EL4S.DE drawdown of -13.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for X03C.DE and EL4S.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


X03C.DEEL4S.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.23%

-13.04%

+0.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.41%

-1.03%

-1.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.41%

-1.03%

-1.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.12%

-5.86%

-6.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.23%

-9.46%

-2.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.13%

-6.04%

+3.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.27%

-5.87%

+3.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.86%

0.32%

+0.54%

Volatility

X03C.DE vs. EL4S.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers II Eurozone Government Bond 3-5 UCITS ETF (X03C.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.01% compared to Deka Deutsche Boerse EUROGOV Germany 1-3 UCITS ETF (EL4S.DE) at 0.44%. This indicates that X03C.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EL4S.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


X03C.DEEL4S.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.01%

0.44%

+0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.31%

0.97%

+1.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.57%

1.10%

+1.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.68%

1.46%

+2.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.09%

1.12%

+1.97%

X03C.DE vs. EL4S.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both X03C.DE and EL4S.DE have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

X03C.DE vs. EL4S.DE - Dividend Comparison

X03C.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, more than EL4S.DE's 1.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EL4S.DE
Deka Deutsche Boerse EUROGOV Germany 1-3 UCITS ETF
1.48%1.20%0.83%0.60%0.88%0.94%0.78%1.06%0.99%1.63%1.46%1.60%
X03C.DE
Xtrackers II Eurozone Government Bond 3-5 UCITS ETF
2.22%1.86%1.05%0.47%0.51%0.37%0.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.62%0.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


X03C.DE and EL4S.DE have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

X03C.DE and EL4S.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

X03C.DE tracks Markit iBoxx® EUR Eurozone 3-5, while EL4S.DE tracks Deutsche Börse EUROGOV® Germany 1-3. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Deka.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for X03C.DE and EL4S.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer