PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
X014.DE vs. LKOR.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

X014.DE vs. LKOR.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI Pacific ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Dist (X014.DE) and Amundi MSCI Korea UCITS ETF Acc (LKOR.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, X014.DE achieves a 17.09% return, which is significantly lower than LKOR.DE's 112.95% return. Over the past 10 years, X014.DE has underperformed LKOR.DE with an annualized return of 8.45%, while LKOR.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 17.09% annualized return.


X014.DE

1D
0.62%
1M
4.13%
YTD
17.09%
6M
17.23%
1Y
30.14%
3Y*
14.07%
5Y*
7.97%
10Y*
8.45%

LKOR.DE

1D
2.43%
1M
4.69%
YTD
112.95%
6M
128.32%
1Y
202.94%
3Y*
48.01%
5Y*
19.75%
10Y*
17.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

X014.DE vs. LKOR.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
X014.DE
Amundi MSCI Pacific ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Dist
17.09%9.40%11.53%8.83%-8.81%10.80%2.05%21.84%-8.83%9.35%
LKOR.DE
Amundi MSCI Korea UCITS ETF Acc
112.95%77.71%-17.75%15.66%-23.88%-0.89%29.98%14.30%-18.23%28.36%

Correlation

The correlation between X014.DE and LKOR.DE is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2008

0.46

The correlation between X014.DE and LKOR.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

X014.DE vs. LKOR.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

X014.DE
X014.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
X014.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
X014.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
X014.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
X014.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
X014.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

LKOR.DE
LKOR.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
LKOR.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LKOR.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
LKOR.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
LKOR.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
LKOR.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

X014.DE vs. LKOR.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Pacific ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Dist (X014.DE) and Amundi MSCI Korea UCITS ETF Acc (LKOR.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


X014.DELKOR.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.67

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.87

9.59

-6.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.61

32.92

-23.32

X014.DE vs. LKOR.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current X014.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is lower than the LKOR.DE Sharpe Ratio of 4.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of X014.DE and LKOR.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

X014.DE vs. LKOR.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum X014.DE drawdown since its inception was -40.49%, smaller than the maximum LKOR.DE drawdown of -63.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for X014.DE and LKOR.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


X014.DELKOR.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.49%

-63.63%

+23.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.47%

-21.02%

+10.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.94%

-30.36%

+12.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.94%

-41.19%

+23.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.05%

-41.81%

+12.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.93%

-6.81%

+4.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.28%

-15.91%

+3.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.13%

6.14%

-3.01%

Volatility

X014.DE vs. LKOR.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi MSCI Pacific ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Dist (X014.DE) is 5.31%, while Amundi MSCI Korea UCITS ETF Acc (LKOR.DE) has a volatility of 19.70%. This indicates that X014.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LKOR.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


X014.DELKOR.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.31%

19.70%

-14.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.46%

37.15%

-23.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.09%

41.16%

-23.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.56%

26.81%

-11.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.66%

25.68%

-10.02%

X014.DE vs. LKOR.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both X014.DE and LKOR.DE have an expense ratio of 0.45%.


Dividends

X014.DE vs. LKOR.DE - Dividend Comparison

X014.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, while LKOR.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
LKOR.DE
Amundi MSCI Korea UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
X014.DE
Amundi MSCI Pacific ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Dist
1.57%1.84%2.13%1.85%2.23%1.47%1.79%2.06%2.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


X014.DE and LKOR.DE have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.45% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

X014.DE and LKOR.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.45% per year.

X014.DE tracks MSCI Pacific ESG Broad CTB Select, while LKOR.DE tracks MSCI Korea 20/35.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for X014.DE and LKOR.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer