PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
X014.DE vs. IQQX.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

X014.DE vs. IQQX.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI Pacific ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Dist (X014.DE) and iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS ETF (IQQX.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, X014.DE achieves a 17.09% return, which is significantly higher than IQQX.DE's 11.95% return. Over the past 10 years, X014.DE has outperformed IQQX.DE with an annualized return of 8.45%, while IQQX.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 6.99% annualized return.


X014.DE

1D
0.62%
1M
4.13%
YTD
17.09%
6M
17.23%
1Y
30.14%
3Y*
14.07%
5Y*
7.97%
10Y*
8.45%

IQQX.DE

1D
0.19%
1M
-1.95%
YTD
11.95%
6M
11.81%
1Y
33.41%
3Y*
18.83%
5Y*
10.34%
10Y*
6.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

X014.DE vs. IQQX.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
X014.DE
Amundi MSCI Pacific ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Dist
17.09%9.40%11.53%8.83%-8.81%10.80%2.05%21.84%-8.83%9.35%
IQQX.DE
iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS ETF
11.95%15.53%12.86%9.57%3.14%12.66%-18.44%17.50%-10.58%2.65%

Correlation

The correlation between X014.DE and IQQX.DE is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2008

0.68

The correlation between X014.DE and IQQX.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.73 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

X014.DE vs. IQQX.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

X014.DE
X014.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
X014.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
X014.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
X014.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
X014.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
X014.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

IQQX.DE
IQQX.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
IQQX.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQQX.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQQX.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
IQQX.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQQX.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

X014.DE vs. IQQX.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Pacific ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Dist (X014.DE) and iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS ETF (IQQX.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


X014.DEIQQX.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.55

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.87

5.40

-2.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.61

18.77

-9.16

X014.DE vs. IQQX.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current X014.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is lower than the IQQX.DE Sharpe Ratio of 3.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of X014.DE and IQQX.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

X014.DE vs. IQQX.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum X014.DE drawdown since its inception was -40.49%, smaller than the maximum IQQX.DE drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for X014.DE and IQQX.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


X014.DEIQQX.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.49%

-65.93%

+25.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.47%

-6.15%

-4.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.94%

-20.22%

+2.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.94%

-20.22%

+2.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.05%

-42.72%

+13.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.93%

-3.82%

+1.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.28%

-11.37%

-0.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.13%

1.78%

+1.35%

Volatility

X014.DE vs. IQQX.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi MSCI Pacific ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Dist (X014.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.31% compared to iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS ETF (IQQX.DE) at 2.98%. This indicates that X014.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IQQX.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


X014.DEIQQX.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.31%

2.98%

+2.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.46%

8.75%

+4.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.09%

10.99%

+7.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.56%

13.05%

+2.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.66%

15.68%

-0.02%

X014.DE vs. IQQX.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

X014.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than IQQX.DE's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

X014.DE vs. IQQX.DE - Dividend Comparison

X014.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, less than IQQX.DE's 4.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IQQX.DE
iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS ETF
4.26%4.23%5.20%5.82%7.03%5.39%3.68%5.44%5.91%4.76%4.39%5.38%
X014.DE
Amundi MSCI Pacific ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Dist
1.57%1.84%2.13%1.85%2.23%1.47%1.79%2.06%2.15%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


X014.DE and IQQX.DE have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, X014.DE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

X014.DE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IQQX.DE.

X014.DE tracks MSCI Pacific ESG Broad CTB Select, while IQQX.DE tracks Dow Jones Asia/Pacific Select Dividend 50. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for X014.DE and 0.59% for IQQX.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for X014.DE and IQQX.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer