X014.DE vs. FVSJ.DE
X014.DE (Amundi MSCI Pacific ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Dist) and FVSJ.DE (Franklin FTSE Asia ex China ex Japan UCITS ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - X014.DE tracks the MSCI Pacific ESG Broad CTB Select while FVSJ.DE tracks the FTSE Asia ex Japan ex China. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, X014.DE returned 7.97%/yr vs 15.20%/yr for FVSJ.DE. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. X014.DE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for FVSJ.DE.
Performance
X014.DE vs. FVSJ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, X014.DE achieves a 17.09% return, which is significantly lower than FVSJ.DE's 49.53% return.
X014.DE
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 4.13%
- YTD
- 17.09%
- 6M
- 17.23%
- 1Y
- 30.14%
- 3Y*
- 14.07%
- 5Y*
- 7.97%
- 10Y*
- 8.45%
FVSJ.DE
- 1D
- 1.21%
- 1M
- 5.17%
- YTD
- 49.53%
- 6M
- 52.61%
- 1Y
- 73.10%
- 3Y*
- 28.24%
- 5Y*
- 15.20%
- 10Y*
- —
X014.DE vs. FVSJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
X014.DE Amundi MSCI Pacific ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Dist | 17.09% | 9.40% | 11.53% | 8.83% | -8.81% | 10.80% | 2.05% | 21.84% | -10.79% |
FVSJ.DE Franklin FTSE Asia ex China ex Japan UCITS ETF | 49.53% | 15.41% | 13.98% | 8.23% | -7.56% | 13.74% | -3.71% | 13.83% | -18.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between X014.DE and FVSJ.DE is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2018 | 0.65 |
The correlation between X014.DE and FVSJ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
X014.DE vs. FVSJ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
X014.DE
FVSJ.DE
X014.DE vs. FVSJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Pacific ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Dist (X014.DE) and Franklin FTSE Asia ex China ex Japan UCITS ETF (FVSJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| X014.DE | FVSJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.57 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.87 | 6.11 | -3.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.61 | 21.52 | -11.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
X014.DE vs. FVSJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum X014.DE drawdown since its inception was -40.49%, which is greater than FVSJ.DE's maximum drawdown of -30.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for X014.DE and FVSJ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| X014.DE | FVSJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.49% | -30.47% | -10.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.47% | -11.91% | +1.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.94% | -21.79% | +3.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.94% | -21.79% | +3.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.05% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.93% | -4.39% | +2.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.28% | -7.27% | -5.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.13% | 3.39% | -0.26% |
Volatility
X014.DE vs. FVSJ.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi MSCI Pacific ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Dist (X014.DE) is 5.31%, while Franklin FTSE Asia ex China ex Japan UCITS ETF (FVSJ.DE) has a volatility of 10.93%. This indicates that X014.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FVSJ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| X014.DE | FVSJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.31% | 10.93% | -5.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.46% | 20.15% | -6.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.09% | 22.45% | -4.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.56% | 16.07% | -0.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.66% | 18.26% | -2.60% |
X014.DE vs. FVSJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
X014.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than FVSJ.DE's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
X014.DE vs. FVSJ.DE - Dividend Comparison
X014.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, while FVSJ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FVSJ.DE Franklin FTSE Asia ex China ex Japan UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
X014.DE Amundi MSCI Pacific ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Dist | 1.57% | 1.84% | 2.13% | 1.85% | 2.23% | 1.47% | 1.79% | 2.06% | 2.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
X014.DE and FVSJ.DE have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FVSJ.DE is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FVSJ.DE is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for X014.DE.
X014.DE tracks MSCI Pacific ESG Broad CTB Select, while FVSJ.DE tracks FTSE Asia ex Japan ex China. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for X014.DE and 0.14% for FVSJ.DE.
Find the right allocation for X014.DE and FVSJ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer