X014.DE vs. ETLK.DE

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

X014.DE (Amundi MSCI Pacific ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Dist) and ETLK.DE (L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - X014.DE tracks the MSCI Pacific ESG Broad CTB Select while ETLK.DE tracks the Solactive Core Developed Markets Pacific ex Japan Large & Mid Cap. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, X014.DE returned 7.97%/yr vs 5.55%/yr for ETLK.DE. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. X014.DE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for ETLK.DE.

Performance

X014.DE vs. ETLK.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI Pacific ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Dist (X014.DE) and L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF (ETLK.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, X014.DE achieves a 17.09% return, which is significantly higher than ETLK.DE's 8.83% return.

X014.DE

• 1D: 0.62%
• 1M: 4.13%
• YTD: 17.09%
• 6M: 17.23%
• 1Y: 30.14%
• 3Y*: 14.07%
• 5Y*: 7.97%
• 10Y*: 8.45%

ETLK.DE

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 8.83%
• 6M: 8.91%
• 1Y: 15.37%
• 3Y*: 11.08%
• 5Y*: 5.55%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

X014.DE vs. ETLK.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
X014.DE Amundi MSCI Pacific ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Dist	17.09%	9.40%	11.53%	8.83%	-8.81%	10.80%	2.05%	15.87%
ETLK.DE L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF	8.83%	7.48%	11.53%	1.31%	-0.52%	11.62%	-1.71%	16.13%

Correlation

The correlation between X014.DE and ETLK.DE is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.68
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2019	0.77

The correlation between X014.DE and ETLK.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

X014.DE vs. ETLK.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

X014.DE

X014.DE Risk / Return Rank: 58
X014.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
X014.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
X014.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 53
X014.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
X014.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 60

ETLK.DE

ETLK.DE Risk / Return Rank: 44
ETLK.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
ETLK.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
ETLK.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 37
ETLK.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
ETLK.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

X014.DE vs. ETLK.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Pacific ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Dist (X014.DE) and L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF (ETLK.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	X014.DE	ETLK.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.66	1.24	+0.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.36	1.86	+0.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.22	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.87	2.56	+0.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.61	6.92	+2.69

X014.DE vs. ETLK.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current X014.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is higher than the ETLK.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of X014.DE and ETLK.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

X014.DE vs. ETLK.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum X014.DE drawdown since its inception was -40.49%, which is greater than ETLK.DE's maximum drawdown of -36.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for X014.DE and ETLK.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	X014.DE	ETLK.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.49%	-36.68%	-3.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.47%	-5.97%	-4.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.94%	-19.91%	+1.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.94%	-19.91%	+1.97%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-29.05%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.93%	-2.51%	+0.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.28%	-5.72%	-6.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.13%	2.22%	+0.91%

Volatility

X014.DE vs. ETLK.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi MSCI Pacific ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Dist (X014.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.31% compared to L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF (ETLK.DE) at 3.72%. This indicates that X014.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETLK.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	X014.DE	ETLK.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.31%	3.72%	+1.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.46%	9.71%	+3.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.09%	12.34%	+5.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.56%	14.85%	+0.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.66%	18.17%	-2.51%

X014.DE vs. ETLK.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

X014.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than ETLK.DE's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

X014.DE vs. ETLK.DE - Dividend Comparison

X014.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, while ETLK.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
ETLK.DE L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
X014.DE Amundi MSCI Pacific ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Dist	1.57%	1.84%	2.13%	1.85%	2.23%	1.47%	1.79%	2.06%	2.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both X014.DE and ETLK.DE in my portfolio?

X014.DE and ETLK.DE have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, X014.DE or ETLK.DE?

On fees, ETLK.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, X014.DE or ETLK.DE?

ETLK.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for X014.DE.

What is the main difference between X014.DE and ETLK.DE?

X014.DE tracks MSCI Pacific ESG Broad CTB Select, while ETLK.DE tracks Solactive Core Developed Markets Pacific ex Japan Large & Mid Cap. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for X014.DE and 0.10% for ETLK.DE.