PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
WXM vs. FCUV.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

WXM vs. FCUV.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about WF International Ltd (WXM) and Fidelity U.S. Value ETF (FCUV.TO).

FCUV.TO is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the Fidelity Canada U.S. Value Index. It was launched on Jun 5, 2020.

Performance

WXM vs. FCUV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WF International Ltd (WXM) and Fidelity U.S. Value ETF (FCUV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

WXM vs. FCUV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
WXM
WF International Ltd		-5.08%-88.11%
FCUV.TO
Fidelity U.S. Value ETF		-0.10%19.47%
Different Trading Currencies

WXM is traded in USD, while FCUV.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the FCUV.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WXM achieves a -5.08% return, which is significantly lower than FCUV.TO's -0.10% return.

WXM

1D
1.00%
1M
12.90%
YTD
-5.08%
6M
-85.89%
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

FCUV.TO

1D
0.61%
1M
-3.85%
YTD
-0.10%
6M
5.97%
1Y
19.28%
3Y*
20.65%
5Y*
16.95%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

WF International Ltd

Fidelity U.S. Value ETF

Often compared with WXM:
WXM vs. VCN.TOWXM vs. QQC.TO
Often compared with FCUV.TO:
FCUV.TO vs. VGG.TOFCUV.TO vs. XCV.TOFCUV.TO vs. VFV.TOFCUV.TO vs. FXM.TOFCUV.TO vs. XSP.TOFCUV.TO vs. RUD.TOFCUV.TO vs. QQC.TO

Return for Risk

WXM vs. FCUV.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
WXM
FCUV.TO
FCUV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
FCUV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCUV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCUV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
FCUV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCUV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WXM vs. FCUV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WF International Ltd (WXM) and Fidelity U.S. Value ETF (FCUV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

WXM vs. FCUV.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

WXMFCUV.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

—

1.01

—

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

—

0.99

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.64

1.19

-1.83

Correlation

The correlation between WXM and FCUV.TO is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

WXM vs. FCUV.TO - Dividend Comparison

WXM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FCUV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%.

TTM202520242023202220212020
WXM
WF International Ltd		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FCUV.TO
Fidelity U.S. Value ETF		1.04%1.13%1.03%1.42%2.71%1.40%1.14%

Drawdowns

WXM vs. FCUV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WXM drawdown since its inception was -90.67%, which is greater than FCUV.TO's maximum drawdown of -19.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WXM and FCUV.TO.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

WXMFCUV.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.67%

-16.47%

-74.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

—

-11.90%

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-16.47%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-88.72%

-3.77%

-84.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.93%

-2.58%

-53.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

—

3.34%

—

Volatility

WXM vs. FCUV.TO - Volatility Comparison

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

WXMFCUV.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

—

4.78%

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

—

11.23%

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

138.35%

19.12%

+119.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

138.35%

17.14%

+121.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

138.35%

16.84%

+121.51%