PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WXM.TO vs. ZCN.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WXM.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Morningstar Canada Momentum Index ETF (WXM.TO) and BMO S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (ZCN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WXM.TO achieves a 18.83% return, which is significantly higher than ZCN.TO's 10.70% return. Over the past 10 years, WXM.TO has outperformed ZCN.TO with an annualized return of 15.24%, while ZCN.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 12.62% annualized return.


WXM.TO

1D
-0.33%
1M
4.70%
YTD
18.83%
6M
22.68%
1Y
46.31%
3Y*
29.82%
5Y*
18.57%
10Y*
15.24%

ZCN.TO

1D
-1.14%
1M
3.62%
YTD
10.70%
6M
12.95%
1Y
34.77%
3Y*
23.62%
5Y*
14.90%
10Y*
12.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WXM.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WXM.TO
CI Morningstar Canada Momentum Index ETF
18.83%38.16%33.93%3.35%-0.42%20.98%4.61%31.48%-4.88%10.06%
ZCN.TO
BMO S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF
10.70%31.51%21.64%11.63%-5.84%25.05%5.69%22.85%-8.84%8.94%

Correlation

The correlation between WXM.TO and ZCN.TO is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2012

0.75

The correlation between WXM.TO and ZCN.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

WXM.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WXM.TO
ZCN.TO

Energy

18.5%
17.5%

Industrials

18.2%
10.3%

Financial Services

17.3%
32.8%

Basic Materials

13.5%
18.4%

Utilities

8.6%
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

6.9%
3.8%

Consumer Defensive

6.1%
2.9%

Communication Services

6.0%
1.8%

Technology

4.9%
7.6%

Healthcare

-

0.1%

Real Estate

-

1.6%

Energy

WXM.TO
18.5%
ZCN.TO
17.5%

Industrials

WXM.TO
18.2%
ZCN.TO
10.3%

Financial Services

WXM.TO
17.3%
ZCN.TO
32.8%

Basic Materials

WXM.TO
13.5%
ZCN.TO
18.4%

Utilities

WXM.TO
8.6%
ZCN.TO
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

WXM.TO
6.9%
ZCN.TO
3.8%

Consumer Defensive

WXM.TO
6.1%
ZCN.TO
2.9%

Communication Services

WXM.TO
6.0%
ZCN.TO
1.8%

Technology

WXM.TO
4.9%
ZCN.TO
7.6%

Healthcare

WXM.TO

-

ZCN.TO
0.1%

Real Estate

WXM.TO

-

ZCN.TO
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WXM.TO vs. ZCN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WXM.TO
WXM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
WXM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WXM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
WXM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
WXM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
WXM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

ZCN.TO
ZCN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
ZCN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZCN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZCN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
ZCN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZCN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WXM.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Morningstar Canada Momentum Index ETF (WXM.TO) and BMO S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (ZCN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WXM.TOZCN.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.50

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.90

3.75

+1.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.82

17.48

+4.34

WXM.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WXM.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.10, which is comparable to the ZCN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WXM.TO and ZCN.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WXM.TOZCN.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.10

2.76

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.18

1.15

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

0.85

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

0.68

+0.23

Drawdowns

WXM.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WXM.TO drawdown since its inception was -40.45%, which is greater than ZCN.TO's maximum drawdown of -37.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WXM.TO and ZCN.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WXM.TOZCN.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.45%

-37.18%

-3.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.49%

-9.30%

-0.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.13%

-12.25%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.87%

-16.25%

+0.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.45%

-37.18%

-3.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.33%

-1.14%

+0.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.48%

-4.76%

+0.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.13%

1.99%

+0.14%

Volatility

WXM.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Volatility Comparison

CI Morningstar Canada Momentum Index ETF (WXM.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.06% compared to BMO S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (ZCN.TO) at 3.49%. This indicates that WXM.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZCN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WXM.TOZCN.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.06%

3.49%

+0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.86%

10.31%

+1.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.02%

12.66%

+2.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.85%

13.09%

+2.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.78%

14.99%

+1.79%

WXM.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

WXM.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than ZCN.TO's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

WXM.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Dividend Comparison

WXM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, less than ZCN.TO's 2.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
WXM.TO
CI Morningstar Canada Momentum Index ETF
1.15%1.25%1.27%1.38%2.25%1.04%0.78%0.94%1.44%1.38%1.58%1.51%
ZCN.TO
BMO S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF
2.03%2.22%2.78%3.29%3.27%2.74%3.24%3.13%3.16%2.71%2.84%3.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


WXM.TO and ZCN.TO have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZCN.TO is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZCN.TO is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for WXM.TO.

WXM.TO is categorized as Momentum, while ZCN.TO is Canada Equities. WXM.TO tracks Morningstar Canada Target Momentum Index, while ZCN.TO tracks S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index. They also come from different issuers: CI Global Asset Management and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for WXM.TO and 0.06% for ZCN.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WXM.TO and ZCN.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer