WXM.TO vs. XEG.TO
WXM.TO (CI Morningstar Canada Momentum Index ETF) and XEG.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WXM.TO is a Momentum fund tracking the Morningstar Canada Target Momentum Index, while XEG.TO is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, WXM.TO returned 15.31%/yr vs 11.72%/yr for XEG.TO. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WXM.TO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for XEG.TO.
Performance
WXM.TO vs. XEG.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WXM.TO achieves a 19.51% return, which is significantly lower than XEG.TO's 45.28% return. Over the past 10 years, WXM.TO has outperformed XEG.TO with an annualized return of 15.31%, while XEG.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 11.72% annualized return.
WXM.TO
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 4.55%
- YTD
- 19.51%
- 6M
- 21.85%
- 1Y
- 48.09%
- 3Y*
- 30.07%
- 5Y*
- 18.70%
- 10Y*
- 15.31%
XEG.TO
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- -0.64%
- YTD
- 45.28%
- 6M
- 40.30%
- 1Y
- 73.90%
- 3Y*
- 28.57%
- 5Y*
- 29.65%
- 10Y*
- 11.72%
WXM.TO vs. XEG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WXM.TO CI Morningstar Canada Momentum Index ETF | 19.51% | 38.16% | 33.93% | 3.35% | -0.42% | 20.98% | 4.61% | 31.48% | -4.88% | 10.06% |
XEG.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF | 45.28% | 16.72% | 14.08% | 3.52% | 53.25% | 83.71% | -34.41% | 8.98% | -27.05% | -11.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between WXM.TO and XEG.TO is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2012 | 0.46 |
Over the past year, the correlation between WXM.TO and XEG.TO has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.46, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
WXM.TO vs. XEG.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WXM.TO
XEG.TO
Energy
Industrials
-
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Technology
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Energy
WXM.TO
XEG.TO
Industrials
WXM.TO
XEG.TO
-
Financial Services
WXM.TO
XEG.TO
-
Basic Materials
WXM.TO
XEG.TO
-
Utilities
WXM.TO
XEG.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
WXM.TO
XEG.TO
-
Consumer Defensive
WXM.TO
XEG.TO
-
Communication Services
WXM.TO
XEG.TO
-
Technology
WXM.TO
XEG.TO
-
Healthcare
WXM.TO
-
XEG.TO
-
Real Estate
WXM.TO
-
XEG.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WXM.TO vs. XEG.TO — Risk / Return Rank
WXM.TO
XEG.TO
WXM.TO vs. XEG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Morningstar Canada Momentum Index ETF (WXM.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF (XEG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WXM.TO | XEG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.57 | 1.51 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.09 | 6.68 | -1.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.67 | 19.94 | +2.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WXM.TO | XEG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.22 | 3.27 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.19 | 1.04 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 | 0.35 | +0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 0.28 | +0.63 |
Drawdowns
WXM.TO vs. XEG.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WXM.TO drawdown since its inception was -40.45%, smaller than the maximum XEG.TO drawdown of -87.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WXM.TO and XEG.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WXM.TO | XEG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.45% | -87.74% | +47.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.49% | -11.12% | +1.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.13% | -25.67% | +13.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.87% | -28.42% | +12.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.45% | -79.66% | +39.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.38% | +3.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.48% | -29.18% | +24.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.13% | 3.72% | -1.59% |
Volatility
WXM.TO vs. XEG.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CI Morningstar Canada Momentum Index ETF (WXM.TO) is 4.05%, while iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF (XEG.TO) has a volatility of 9.24%. This indicates that WXM.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XEG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WXM.TO | XEG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.05% | 9.24% | -5.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.85% | 18.90% | -7.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.03% | 22.74% | -7.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.85% | 28.62% | -12.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.78% | 33.40% | -16.62% |
WXM.TO vs. XEG.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
WXM.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XEG.TO's 0.61% expense ratio.
Dividends
WXM.TO vs. XEG.TO - Dividend Comparison
WXM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, less than XEG.TO's 2.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WXM.TO CI Morningstar Canada Momentum Index ETF | 1.15% | 1.25% | 1.27% | 1.38% | 2.25% | 1.04% | 0.78% | 0.94% | 1.44% | 1.38% | 1.58% | 1.51% |
XEG.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF | 2.64% | 3.63% | 3.46% | 4.26% | 3.31% | 1.64% | 2.96% | 2.70% | 2.25% | 1.41% | 1.40% | 3.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WXM.TO and XEG.TO have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XEG.TO is cheaper at 0.61% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XEG.TO is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for WXM.TO.
WXM.TO is categorized as Momentum, while XEG.TO is Energy Equities. WXM.TO tracks Morningstar Canada Target Momentum Index, while XEG.TO tracks S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: CI Global Asset Management and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for WXM.TO and 0.61% for XEG.TO.
Find the right allocation for WXM.TO and XEG.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer