PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WXM.TO vs. XEG.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WXM.TO vs. XEG.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Morningstar Canada Momentum Index ETF (WXM.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF (XEG.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WXM.TO achieves a 19.51% return, which is significantly lower than XEG.TO's 45.28% return. Over the past 10 years, WXM.TO has outperformed XEG.TO with an annualized return of 15.31%, while XEG.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 11.72% annualized return.


WXM.TO

1D
0.58%
1M
4.55%
YTD
19.51%
6M
21.85%
1Y
48.09%
3Y*
30.07%
5Y*
18.70%
10Y*
15.31%

XEG.TO

1D
0.65%
1M
-0.64%
YTD
45.28%
6M
40.30%
1Y
73.90%
3Y*
28.57%
5Y*
29.65%
10Y*
11.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WXM.TO vs. XEG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WXM.TO
CI Morningstar Canada Momentum Index ETF
19.51%38.16%33.93%3.35%-0.42%20.98%4.61%31.48%-4.88%10.06%
XEG.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF
45.28%16.72%14.08%3.52%53.25%83.71%-34.41%8.98%-27.05%-11.18%

Correlation

The correlation between WXM.TO and XEG.TO is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2012

0.46

Over the past year, the correlation between WXM.TO and XEG.TO has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.46, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

WXM.TO vs. XEG.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WXM.TO
XEG.TO

Energy

18.5%
100.0%

Industrials

18.2%

-

Financial Services

17.3%

-

Basic Materials

13.5%

-

Utilities

8.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

6.9%

-

Consumer Defensive

6.1%

-

Communication Services

6.0%

-

Technology

4.9%

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Energy

WXM.TO
18.5%
XEG.TO
100.0%

Industrials

WXM.TO
18.2%
XEG.TO

-

Financial Services

WXM.TO
17.3%
XEG.TO

-

Basic Materials

WXM.TO
13.5%
XEG.TO

-

Utilities

WXM.TO
8.6%
XEG.TO

-

Consumer Cyclical

WXM.TO
6.9%
XEG.TO

-

Consumer Defensive

WXM.TO
6.1%
XEG.TO

-

Communication Services

WXM.TO
6.0%
XEG.TO

-

Technology

WXM.TO
4.9%
XEG.TO

-

Healthcare

WXM.TO

-

XEG.TO

-

Real Estate

WXM.TO

-

XEG.TO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WXM.TO vs. XEG.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WXM.TO
WXM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
WXM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WXM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
WXM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
WXM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
WXM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

XEG.TO
XEG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
XEG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
XEG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WXM.TO vs. XEG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Morningstar Canada Momentum Index ETF (WXM.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF (XEG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WXM.TOXEG.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.51

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.09

6.68

-1.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.67

19.94

+2.73

WXM.TO vs. XEG.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WXM.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.22, which is comparable to the XEG.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WXM.TO and XEG.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WXM.TOXEG.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.22

3.27

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.19

1.04

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

0.35

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

0.28

+0.63

Drawdowns

WXM.TO vs. XEG.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WXM.TO drawdown since its inception was -40.45%, smaller than the maximum XEG.TO drawdown of -87.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WXM.TO and XEG.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WXM.TOXEG.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.45%

-87.74%

+47.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.49%

-11.12%

+1.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.13%

-25.67%

+13.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.87%

-28.42%

+12.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.45%

-79.66%

+39.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.38%

+3.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.48%

-29.18%

+24.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.13%

3.72%

-1.59%

Volatility

WXM.TO vs. XEG.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CI Morningstar Canada Momentum Index ETF (WXM.TO) is 4.05%, while iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF (XEG.TO) has a volatility of 9.24%. This indicates that WXM.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XEG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WXM.TOXEG.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.05%

9.24%

-5.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.85%

18.90%

-7.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.03%

22.74%

-7.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.85%

28.62%

-12.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.78%

33.40%

-16.62%

WXM.TO vs. XEG.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

WXM.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XEG.TO's 0.61% expense ratio.


Dividends

WXM.TO vs. XEG.TO - Dividend Comparison

WXM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, less than XEG.TO's 2.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
WXM.TO
CI Morningstar Canada Momentum Index ETF
1.15%1.25%1.27%1.38%2.25%1.04%0.78%0.94%1.44%1.38%1.58%1.51%
XEG.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF
2.64%3.63%3.46%4.26%3.31%1.64%2.96%2.70%2.25%1.41%1.40%3.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


WXM.TO and XEG.TO have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XEG.TO is cheaper at 0.61% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XEG.TO is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for WXM.TO.

WXM.TO is categorized as Momentum, while XEG.TO is Energy Equities. WXM.TO tracks Morningstar Canada Target Momentum Index, while XEG.TO tracks S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: CI Global Asset Management and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for WXM.TO and 0.61% for XEG.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WXM.TO and XEG.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer