WXM.TO vs. CCCX-B.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about CI Morningstar Canada Momentum Index ETF (WXM.TO) and CI Galaxy Core Multi-Crypto ETF (CAD) (CCCX-B.TO).
WXM.TO and CCCX-B.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. WXM.TO is a passively managed fund by CI Global Asset Management that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Canada Target Momentum Index. It was launched on Feb 13, 2012. CCCX-B.TO is an actively managed fund by CI Global Asset Management. It was launched on Aug 22, 2025.
Performance
WXM.TO vs. CCCX-B.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WXM.TO vs. CCCX-B.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WXM.TO CI Morningstar Canada Momentum Index ETF | 8.73% | 16.65% |
CCCX-B.TO CI Galaxy Core Multi-Crypto ETF (CAD) | -26.11% | -27.81% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WXM.TO achieves a 8.73% return, which is significantly higher than CCCX-B.TO's -26.11% return.
WXM.TO
- 1D
- 3.05%
- 1M
- -4.45%
- YTD
- 8.73%
- 6M
- 21.99%
- 1Y
- 47.64%
- 3Y*
- 25.75%
- 5Y*
- 18.27%
- 10Y*
- 14.63%
CCCX-B.TO
- 1D
- -1.33%
- 1M
- 3.39%
- YTD
- -26.11%
- 6M
- -46.65%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WXM.TO vs. CCCX-B.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
WXM.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than CCCX-B.TO's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
WXM.TO vs. CCCX-B.TO — Risk / Return Rank
WXM.TO
CCCX-B.TO
WXM.TO vs. CCCX-B.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Morningstar Canada Momentum Index ETF (WXM.TO) and CI Galaxy Core Multi-Crypto ETF (CAD) (CCCX-B.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WXM.TO | CCCX-B.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.84 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.56 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.38 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.78 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WXM.TO | CCCX-B.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.84 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.17 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | -1.32 | +2.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between WXM.TO and CCCX-B.TO is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
WXM.TO vs. CCCX-B.TO - Dividend Comparison
WXM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, while CCCX-B.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WXM.TO CI Morningstar Canada Momentum Index ETF | 1.26% | 1.25% | 1.27% | 1.38% | 2.25% | 1.04% | 0.78% | 0.94% | 1.44% | 1.38% | 1.58% | 1.51% |
CCCX-B.TO CI Galaxy Core Multi-Crypto ETF (CAD) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
WXM.TO vs. CCCX-B.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WXM.TO drawdown since its inception was -40.45%, smaller than the maximum CCCX-B.TO drawdown of -54.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WXM.TO and CCCX-B.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WXM.TO | CCCX-B.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.45% | -54.49% | +14.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.45% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.21% | -52.08% | +46.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.52% | -28.87% | +24.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.48% | — | — |
Volatility
WXM.TO vs. CCCX-B.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WXM.TO | CCCX-B.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.24% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.62% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.85% | 49.94% | -33.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.74% | 49.94% | -34.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.68% | 49.94% | -33.26% |