WXET vs. CPSP
WXET (Teucrium 2x Daily Wheat ETF) and CPSP (Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - April) are both exchange-traded funds - WXET is a Leveraged Commodities fund actively managed by Teucrium, while CPSP is a S&P 500 fund actively managed by Calamos. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, WXET returned -7.52% vs 7.32% for CPSP. At a correlation of -0.19, they often move in opposite directions. WXET charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for CPSP.
Performance
WXET vs. CPSP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WXET achieves a 27.79% return, which is significantly higher than CPSP's 3.18% return.
WXET
- 1D
- -1.97%
- 1M
- -11.55%
- YTD
- 27.79%
- 6M
- 12.24%
- 1Y
- -7.52%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CPSP
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- 3.18%
- 6M
- 3.78%
- 1Y
- 7.32%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WXET vs. CPSP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WXET Teucrium 2x Daily Wheat ETF | 27.79% | -31.94% |
CPSP Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - April | 3.18% | 5.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between WXET and CPSP is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2025 | -0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WXET vs. CPSP — Risk / Return Rank
WXET
CPSP
WXET vs. CPSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium 2x Daily Wheat ETF (WXET) and Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CPSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WXET | CPSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | 5.18 | -5.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.14 | 9.39 | -9.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 2.34 | -1.33 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.16 | 19.72 | -19.88 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.24 | 99.44 | -99.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WXET | CPSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 | 5.18 | -5.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.31 | 3.18 | -3.49 |
Drawdowns
WXET vs. CPSP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WXET drawdown since its inception was -48.31%, which is greater than CPSP's maximum drawdown of -1.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WXET and CPSP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WXET | CPSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.31% | -1.73% | -46.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.64% | -0.37% | -35.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.94% | 0.00% | -33.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.48% | -0.08% | -30.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.34% | 0.07% | +23.27% |
Volatility
WXET vs. CPSP - Volatility Comparison
Teucrium 2x Daily Wheat ETF (WXET) has a higher volatility of 21.55% compared to Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CPSP) at 0.34%. This indicates that WXET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CPSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WXET | CPSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.55% | 0.34% | +21.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.33% | 0.84% | +38.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.90% | 1.42% | +48.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.44% | 2.38% | +46.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.44% | 2.38% | +46.06% |
WXET vs. CPSP - Expense Ratio Comparison
WXET has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than CPSP's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
WXET vs. CPSP - Dividend Comparison
WXET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, while CPSP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CPSP Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WXET Teucrium 2x Daily Wheat ETF | 1.97% | 3.57% | 0.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WXET and CPSP have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WXET has higher volatility (21.55%) compared to CPSP (0.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WXET dropped -48.31% vs CPSP's -1.73%.
On 1-year performance, CPSP leads with 7.32% vs -7.52% for WXET. On fees, CPSP is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, CPSP has been the lower-risk option at 0.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CPSP has performed better with a 7.32% return vs -7.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CPSP is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for WXET.
WXET has the higher dividend yield at 1.97%, compared with 0.00% for CPSP.
WXET is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while CPSP is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for WXET and 0.69% for CPSP.
CPSP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.18 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WXET and CPSP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer