PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WXET vs. CPSA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WXET vs. CPSA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Teucrium 2x Daily Wheat ETF (WXET) and Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - August (CPSA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WXET achieves a 36.38% return, which is significantly higher than CPSA's 3.65% return.


WXET

1D
-7.53%
1M
12.13%
6M
20.77%
YTD
36.38%
1Y
13.99%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-10.00%

CPSA

1D
0.17%
1M
0.47%
6M
3.14%
YTD
3.65%
1Y
6.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$119.05K$109.06K$94.91K
$349.23K$373.64K$493.96K

WXET vs. CPSA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
WXET
Teucrium 2x Daily Wheat ETF
36.38%-37.99%-0.40%
CPSA
Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - August
3.65%7.39%-0.30%

Correlation

The correlation between WXET and CPSA is -0.21, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2024

-0.08

The correlation between WXET and CPSA shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to -0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WXET vs. CPSA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WXET
WXET Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
WXET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WXET Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
WXET Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
WXET Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
WXET Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

CPSA
CPSA Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
CPSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPSA Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
CPSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPSA Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WXET vs. CPSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium 2x Daily Wheat ETF (WXET) and Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - August (CPSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WXETCPSADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.66

-0.58

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.36

4.46

-4.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.84

25.46

-24.62

WXET vs. CPSA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WXET Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is lower than the CPSA Sharpe Ratio of 3.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WXET and CPSA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WXET vs. CPSA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WXET drawdown since its inception was -48.31%, which is greater than CPSA's maximum drawdown of -4.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WXET and CPSA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WXETCPSADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.31%

-4.72%

-43.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.76%

-1.47%

-29.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.50%

0.00%

-29.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.49%

-0.36%

-30.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.29%

0.26%

+13.03%

Volatility

WXET vs. CPSA - Volatility Comparison

Teucrium 2x Daily Wheat ETF (WXET) has a higher volatility of 21.37% compared to Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - August (CPSA) at 0.26%. This indicates that WXET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CPSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WXETCPSADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.37%

0.26%

+21.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

44.27%

1.70%

+42.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.52%

2.14%

+49.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.83%

3.99%

+45.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.83%

3.99%

+45.84%

WXET vs. CPSA - Expense Ratio Comparison

WXET has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than CPSA's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

WXET vs. CPSA - Dividend Comparison

WXET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, while CPSA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
CPSA
Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - August
0.00%0.00%0.00%
WXET
Teucrium 2x Daily Wheat ETF
1.74%3.57%0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


WXET and CPSA have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WXET has higher volatility (21.37%) compared to CPSA (0.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WXET dropped -48.31% vs CPSA's -4.72%.

On 1-year performance, WXET leads with 13.99% vs 6.25% for CPSA. On fees, CPSA is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, CPSA has been the lower-risk option at 0.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, WXET has performed better with a 13.99% return vs 6.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CPSA is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for WXET.

WXET has the higher dividend yield at 1.74%, compared with 0.00% for CPSA.

WXET is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while CPSA is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for WXET and 0.69% for CPSA.

CPSA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.08 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WXET and CPSA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer