PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WXAG.L vs. ROLG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WXAG.L vs. ROLG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF USD Acc (WXAG.L) and iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Swap UCITS ETF USD (ROLG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

WXAG.L is traded in USD, while ROLG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the ROLG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with WXAG.L having a 28.27% return and ROLG.L slightly lower at 27.44%.


WXAG.L

1D
-1.03%
1M
-3.04%
YTD
28.27%
6M
35.13%
1Y
63.03%
3Y*
20.75%
5Y*
10Y*

ROLG.L

1D
-1.60%
1M
-2.74%
YTD
27.44%
6M
28.45%
1Y
42.94%
3Y*
17.18%
5Y*
13.34%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WXAG.L vs. ROLG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
WXAG.L
WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF USD Acc
28.27%32.53%2.91%-8.03%19.40%-6.94%
ROLG.L
iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Swap UCITS ETF USD
27.44%16.84%4.48%-2.47%16.56%-3.38%

Correlation

The correlation between WXAG.L and ROLG.L is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2021

0.68

The correlation between WXAG.L and ROLG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (all time) to 0.79 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WXAG.L vs. ROLG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WXAG.L
WXAG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
WXAG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WXAG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
WXAG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
WXAG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
WXAG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

ROLG.L
ROLG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
ROLG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROLG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROLG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
ROLG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROLG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WXAG.L vs. ROLG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF USD Acc (WXAG.L) and iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Swap UCITS ETF USD (ROLG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WXAG.LROLG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.46

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.23

6.36

-1.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.93

18.09

+0.84

WXAG.L vs. ROLG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WXAG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.86, which is comparable to the ROLG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WXAG.L and ROLG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WXAG.LROLG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.86

2.65

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.61

+0.08

Drawdowns

WXAG.L vs. ROLG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WXAG.L drawdown since its inception was -26.77%, smaller than the maximum ROLG.L drawdown of -30.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WXAG.L and ROLG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WXAG.LROLG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.77%

-30.44%

+3.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.00%

-6.72%

-5.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.35%

-11.53%

-2.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.32%

-4.89%

-1.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.07%

-8.95%

-7.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.32%

2.37%

+0.95%

Volatility

WXAG.L vs. ROLG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF USD Acc (WXAG.L) is 5.15%, while iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Swap UCITS ETF USD (ROLG.L) has a volatility of 6.06%. This indicates that WXAG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROLG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WXAG.LROLG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.15%

6.06%

-0.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.27%

13.97%

+5.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.92%

16.15%

+5.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.54%

18.07%

+4.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.54%

17.35%

+5.19%

WXAG.L vs. ROLG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WXAG.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ROLG.L's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

WXAG.L vs. ROLG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither WXAG.L nor ROLG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


WXAG.L and ROLG.L have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ROLG.L is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ROLG.L is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for WXAG.L.

WXAG.L tracks Morgan Stanley RADAR ex Agriculture & Livestock Commodity, while ROLG.L tracks Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for WXAG.L and 0.28% for ROLG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WXAG.L and ROLG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer