WXAG.L vs. BCOM.L

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

WXAG.L (WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF USD Acc) and BCOM.L (L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF - USD Accumulating ETF) are both Commodities funds - WXAG.L tracks the Morgan Stanley RADAR ex Agriculture & Livestock Commodity while BCOM.L tracks the Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, WXAG.L returned 17.27%/yr vs 12.55%/yr for BCOM.L. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WXAG.L charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for BCOM.L.

Performance

WXAG.L vs. BCOM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF USD Acc (WXAG.L) and L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF - USD Accumulating ETF (BCOM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with WXAG.L having a 20.46% return and BCOM.L slightly higher at 21.11%.

WXAG.L

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: -1.16%
• 6M: 11.74%
• YTD: 20.46%
• 1Y: 40.50%
• 3Y*: 17.27%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BCOM.L

• 1D: 0.72%
• 1M: 2.57%
• 6M: 17.34%
• YTD: 21.11%
• 1Y: 30.23%
• 3Y*: 12.55%
• 5Y*: 10.55%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WXAG.L vs. BCOM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
WXAG.L WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF USD Acc	20.46%	32.44%	2.94%	-8.02%	15.50%	2.60%
BCOM.L L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF - USD Accumulating ETF	21.11%	16.19%	4.43%	-7.25%	15.63%	-5.18%

Correlation

The correlation between WXAG.L and BCOM.L is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2021	0.77

The correlation between WXAG.L and BCOM.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

WXAG.L vs. BCOM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WXAG.L

WXAG.L Risk / Return Rank: 65
WXAG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
WXAG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
WXAG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 72
WXAG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
WXAG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 54

BCOM.L

BCOM.L Risk / Return Rank: 64
BCOM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
BCOM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
BCOM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 72
BCOM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
BCOM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WXAG.L vs. BCOM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF USD Acc (WXAG.L) and L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF - USD Accumulating ETF (BCOM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WXAG.L	BCOM.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.83	1.78	+0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.34	2.32	+0.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.32	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.31	2.10	+0.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.98	6.60	+0.38

WXAG.L vs. BCOM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WXAG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the BCOM.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WXAG.L and BCOM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WXAG.L vs. BCOM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WXAG.L drawdown since its inception was -26.79%, smaller than the maximum BCOM.L drawdown of -31.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WXAG.L and BCOM.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	WXAG.L	BCOM.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.79%	-31.65%	+4.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.44%	-14.33%	-3.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.44%	-14.33%	-3.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.27%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.08%	-8.13%	-3.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.78%	-11.63%	-3.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.79%	4.52%	+1.27%

Volatility

WXAG.L vs. BCOM.L - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF USD Acc (WXAG.L) has a higher volatility of 4.57% compared to L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF - USD Accumulating ETF (BCOM.L) at 4.12%. This indicates that WXAG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCOM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WXAG.L	BCOM.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.57%	4.12%	+0.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.89%	14.82%	+3.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.03%	16.93%	+5.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.37%	16.80%	+3.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.37%	15.34%	+5.03%

WXAG.L vs. BCOM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WXAG.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than BCOM.L's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

WXAG.L vs. BCOM.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither WXAG.L nor BCOM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WXAG.L and BCOM.L in my portfolio?

WXAG.L and BCOM.L have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, WXAG.L or BCOM.L?

On fees, BCOM.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WXAG.L or BCOM.L?

BCOM.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for WXAG.L.

What is the main difference between WXAG.L and BCOM.L?

WXAG.L tracks Morgan Stanley RADAR ex Agriculture & Livestock Commodity, while BCOM.L tracks Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and L&G. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for WXAG.L and 0.15% for BCOM.L.