WVALX vs. RESGX

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

WVALX (Weitz Value Fund) and RESGX (Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, WVALX returned 9.33%/yr vs 12.42%/yr for RESGX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WVALX charges 1.04%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for RESGX.

Performance

WVALX vs. RESGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Weitz Value Fund (WVALX) and Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WVALX achieves a -3.05% return, which is significantly lower than RESGX's 23.98% return. Over the past 10 years, WVALX has underperformed RESGX with an annualized return of 9.33%, while RESGX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.42% annualized return.

WVALX

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: 4.44%
• 6M: -4.23%
• YTD: -3.05%
• 1Y: -3.21%
• 3Y*: 5.25%
• 5Y*: 2.99%
• 10Y*: 9.33%

RESGX

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: -1.93%
• 6M: 19.32%
• YTD: 23.98%
• 1Y: 35.11%
• 3Y*: 17.03%
• 5Y*: 9.74%
• 10Y*: 12.42%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WVALX vs. RESGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WVALX Weitz Value Fund	-3.05%	-0.21%	12.76%	29.72%	-22.89%	26.86%	18.41%	34.16%	-4.88%	15.60%
RESGX Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio	23.98%	10.30%	11.40%	15.59%	-14.71%	26.58%	9.57%	24.25%	-6.47%	22.82%

Correlation

The correlation between WVALX and RESGX is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.55
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.75
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016	0.84

Over the past year, the correlation between WVALX and RESGX has dropped to 0.55 - well below their long-term average of 0.84, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

WVALX vs. RESGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WVALX

WVALX Risk / Return Rank: 2
WVALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
WVALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
WVALX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
WVALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
WVALX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

RESGX

RESGX Risk / Return Rank: 90
RESGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
RESGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
RESGX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
RESGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
RESGX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WVALX vs. RESGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Weitz Value Fund (WVALX) and Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WVALX	RESGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.23	2.43	-2.66
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.22	3.36	-3.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.42	-0.45
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.19	4.60	-4.79
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.48	15.47	-15.96

WVALX vs. RESGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WVALX Sharpe Ratio is -0.23, which is lower than the RESGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WVALX and RESGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WVALX vs. RESGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WVALX drawdown since its inception was -61.96%, which is greater than RESGX's maximum drawdown of -37.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WVALX and RESGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	WVALX	RESGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.96%	-37.80%	-24.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.45%	-7.84%	-9.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.92%	-20.50%	+0.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.36%	-23.58%	-5.78%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.57%	-37.80%	+5.23%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.52%	-3.07%	-5.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.74%	-4.98%	-2.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.90%	2.32%	+4.58%

Volatility

WVALX vs. RESGX - Volatility Comparison

Weitz Value Fund (WVALX) has a higher volatility of 4.38% compared to Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX) at 4.06%. This indicates that WVALX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RESGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WVALX	RESGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.38%	4.06%	+0.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.64%	11.65%	-0.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.61%	14.87%	-0.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.30%	17.32%	+0.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.23%	18.65%	-0.42%

WVALX vs. RESGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WVALX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than RESGX's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

WVALX vs. RESGX - Dividend Comparison

WVALX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.51%, more than RESGX's 6.88% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RESGX Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio	6.88%	8.24%	13.38%	9.08%	8.17%	9.98%	0.82%	1.90%	5.09%	0.94%	0.72%	0.00%
WVALX Weitz Value Fund	22.51%	21.83%	11.03%	5.38%	14.15%	3.77%	9.12%	4.70%	10.95%	7.16%	0.00%	12.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WVALX and RESGX in my portfolio?

WVALX and RESGX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WVALX or RESGX?

WVALX has higher volatility (4.38%) compared to RESGX (4.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WVALX dropped -61.96% vs RESGX's -37.80%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RESGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.