PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WUTI.L vs. ACWI.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WUTI.L vs. ACWI.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI World Utilits UCITS ETF (WUTI.L) and SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (ACWI.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

WUTI.L is traded in USD, while ACWI.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the ACWI.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WUTI.L achieves a 4.38% return, which is significantly lower than ACWI.L's 11.55% return. Over the past 10 years, WUTI.L has underperformed ACWI.L with an annualized return of 8.54%, while ACWI.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.67% annualized return.


WUTI.L

1D
-1.24%
1M
-5.68%
YTD
4.38%
6M
3.86%
1Y
14.75%
3Y*
14.64%
5Y*
8.80%
10Y*
8.54%

ACWI.L

1D
0.01%
1M
4.40%
YTD
11.55%
6M
13.16%
1Y
29.03%
3Y*
21.18%
5Y*
11.34%
10Y*
12.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WUTI.L vs. ACWI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WUTI.L
SPDR MSCI World Utilits UCITS ETF
4.38%25.37%13.26%0.13%-3.55%10.54%4.43%22.22%1.82%13.96%
ACWI.L
SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF
11.55%22.95%17.67%21.68%-18.36%19.19%15.32%26.81%-9.98%23.68%

Correlation

The correlation between WUTI.L and ACWI.L is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2016

0.43

The correlation between WUTI.L and ACWI.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.43 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

WUTI.L vs. ACWI.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WUTI.L
ACWI.L

Utilities

98.1%
2.7%

Industrials

1.4%
10.9%

Energy

0.5%
4.3%

Basic Materials

-

3.6%

Communication Services

-

9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.9%

Financial Services

-

16.5%

Healthcare

-

8.0%

Real Estate

-

1.7%

Technology

-

29.2%

Utilities

WUTI.L
98.1%
ACWI.L
2.7%

Industrials

WUTI.L
1.4%
ACWI.L
10.9%

Energy

WUTI.L
0.5%
ACWI.L
4.3%

Basic Materials

WUTI.L

-

ACWI.L
3.6%

Communication Services

WUTI.L

-

ACWI.L
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

WUTI.L

-

ACWI.L
9.3%

Consumer Defensive

WUTI.L

-

ACWI.L
4.9%

Financial Services

WUTI.L

-

ACWI.L
16.5%

Healthcare

WUTI.L

-

ACWI.L
8.0%

Real Estate

WUTI.L

-

ACWI.L
1.7%

Technology

WUTI.L

-

ACWI.L
29.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WUTI.L vs. ACWI.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WUTI.L
WUTI.L Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
WUTI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WUTI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
WUTI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
WUTI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
WUTI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

ACWI.L
ACWI.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
ACWI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WUTI.L vs. ACWI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World Utilits UCITS ETF (WUTI.L) and SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (ACWI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WUTI.LACWI.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.44

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.86

3.18

-1.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.73

13.81

-8.08

WUTI.L vs. ACWI.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WUTI.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is lower than the ACWI.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WUTI.L and ACWI.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WUTI.LACWI.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.16

2.44

-1.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.74

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.81

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.66

-0.10

Drawdowns

WUTI.L vs. ACWI.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WUTI.L drawdown since its inception was -33.85%, roughly equal to the maximum ACWI.L drawdown of -33.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WUTI.L and ACWI.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WUTI.LACWI.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.85%

-33.59%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.89%

-9.09%

+1.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.35%

-17.16%

-0.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.86%

-26.90%

+5.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.85%

-33.59%

-0.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.69%

-0.72%

-6.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.99%

-4.91%

-0.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.57%

2.10%

+0.47%

Volatility

WUTI.L vs. ACWI.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI World Utilits UCITS ETF (WUTI.L) has a higher volatility of 4.19% compared to SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (ACWI.L) at 3.36%. This indicates that WUTI.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACWI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WUTI.LACWI.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.19%

3.36%

+0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.35%

9.21%

+1.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.68%

11.86%

+0.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.10%

15.24%

-0.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.63%

15.66%

-0.03%

WUTI.L vs. ACWI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WUTI.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWI.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

WUTI.L vs. ACWI.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither WUTI.L nor ACWI.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


WUTI.L and ACWI.L have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WUTI.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WUTI.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for ACWI.L.

WUTI.L is categorized as Utilities Equities, while ACWI.L is Global Equities. WUTI.L tracks MSCI World/Utilities NR USD, while ACWI.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for WUTI.L and 0.40% for ACWI.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WUTI.L and ACWI.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer