PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WUTI.AS vs. AINF.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WUTI.AS vs. AINF.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF (WUTI.AS) and iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AINF.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

WUTI.AS is traded in EUR, while AINF.AS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AINF.AS values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WUTI.AS achieves a 5.41% return, which is significantly lower than AINF.AS's 58.99% return.


WUTI.AS

1D
-1.57%
1M
-5.07%
YTD
5.41%
6M
4.50%
1Y
12.22%
3Y*
11.62%
5Y*
9.79%
10Y*
8.29%

AINF.AS

1D
-1.98%
1M
22.39%
YTD
58.99%
6M
58.92%
1Y
114.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WUTI.AS vs. AINF.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
WUTI.AS
SPDR MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF
5.41%11.17%-1.82%
AINF.AS
iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
58.99%27.53%0.59%

Correlation

The correlation between WUTI.AS and AINF.AS is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2024

0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WUTI.AS vs. AINF.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WUTI.AS
WUTI.AS Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
WUTI.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WUTI.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
WUTI.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
WUTI.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
WUTI.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

AINF.AS
AINF.AS Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
AINF.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AINF.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
AINF.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
AINF.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
AINF.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WUTI.AS vs. AINF.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF (WUTI.AS) and iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AINF.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WUTI.ASAINF.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.69

-0.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

9.72

-8.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.58

32.15

-27.57

WUTI.AS vs. AINF.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WUTI.AS Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is lower than the AINF.AS Sharpe Ratio of 4.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WUTI.AS and AINF.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WUTI.ASAINF.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

4.55

-3.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

2.16

-1.73

Drawdowns

WUTI.AS vs. AINF.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WUTI.AS drawdown since its inception was -33.51%, which is greater than AINF.AS's maximum drawdown of -30.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WUTI.AS and AINF.AS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WUTI.ASAINF.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.51%

-30.52%

-2.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.21%

-11.60%

+4.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.14%

-1.98%

-5.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.59%

-5.71%

-1.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.65%

3.53%

-0.88%

Volatility

WUTI.AS vs. AINF.AS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF (WUTI.AS) is 4.31%, while iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AINF.AS) has a volatility of 9.35%. This indicates that WUTI.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AINF.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WUTI.ASAINF.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.31%

9.35%

-5.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.99%

18.82%

-8.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.17%

24.75%

-12.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.14%

28.41%

-14.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.42%

28.41%

-11.99%

WUTI.AS vs. AINF.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

WUTI.AS has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than AINF.AS's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

WUTI.AS vs. AINF.AS - Dividend Comparison

Neither WUTI.AS nor AINF.AS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


WUTI.AS and AINF.AS have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WUTI.AS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WUTI.AS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for AINF.AS.

WUTI.AS is categorized as Utilities Equities, while AINF.AS is Technology Equities. WUTI.AS tracks MSCI World/Utilities NR USD, while AINF.AS tracks STOXX Global AI Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for WUTI.AS and 0.35% for AINF.AS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WUTI.AS and AINF.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer