WULX vs. SNXX
WULX (Tradr 2X Long WULF Daily ETF) and SNXX (Tradr 2X Long SNDK Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Tradr. Both are actively managed. Their 0.44 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. WULX charges 1.30%/yr vs 1.49%/yr for SNXX.
Performance
WULX vs. SNXX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
WULX
- 1D
- -2.02%
- 1M
- -38.57%
- 6M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- 26.70%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
SNXX
- 1D
- -10.88%
- 1M
- -60.92%
- 6M
- 102.16%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.51B | $1.59B | $1.43B | |
| $5.78M | $8.80M | $7.30M |
WULX vs. SNXX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
WULX Tradr 2X Long WULF Daily ETF | -7.91% |
SNXX Tradr 2X Long SNDK Daily ETF | 184.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between WULX and SNXX is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2026 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WULX vs. SNXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long WULF Daily ETF (WULX) and Tradr 2X Long SNDK Daily ETF (SNXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WULX vs. SNXX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WULX drawdown since its inception was -75.66%, smaller than the maximum SNXX drawdown of -85.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WULX and SNXX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WULX | SNXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.66% | -85.09% | +9.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -67.76% | -79.82% | +12.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.68% | -22.82% | -8.86% |
Volatility
WULX vs. SNXX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WULX | SNXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 191.47% | 237.71% | -46.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 191.47% | 237.71% | -46.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 191.47% | 237.71% | -46.24% |
WULX vs. SNXX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WULX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than SNXX's 1.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
WULX vs. SNXX - Dividend Comparison
Neither WULX nor SNXX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
WULX and SNXX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WULX is cheaper at 1.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WULX is cheaper with a 1.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for SNXX.
WULX and SNXX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Their fees differ too: 1.30% for WULX and 1.49% for SNXX.
Find the right allocation for WULX and SNXX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer